Influence of different ventilation modes of non-invasive ventilation in patients with hypercapnic-hypoxic ventilation failure – iVAPS vs. ST

<bold>Introduction:</bold> COPD is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Patients may develop hypercapnic-hypoxic respiratory failure with respiratory acidosis as the disease progresses at an advanced stage. Therefore, with this study, we address the question of whether a modern beaming mode "iVAPS" has an advantage over a conventional mode "ST". <bold>Methods:</bold> This prospective, randomized study with a cross-over design single-blind included 50 patients with COPD GOLD IV/E and hypercapnic-hypoxic ventilation failure at initiation of noninvasive ventilation. After randomization, ventilation was initiated in either ST or iVAPS mode and switched to the other mode after three months. Evaluation parameters included therapy adherence, CO2, quality of life, depression, arterial stiffness, echocardiographic parameters and the 6-minute walk test. <bold>Results:</bold> Results showed significantly better treatment adherence, higher quality of life and improved cognitive performance for iVAPS. The iVAPS mode also led to more effective CO2 elimination. In addition, depending on the duration of use and the mode, there was an advantage for the iVAPS mode in terms of the washed out CO2. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> The study concludes a clear benefit for iVAPS in terms of treatment adherence, quality of life, cognitive performance and mood, but recommends further long-term mortality studies and telemedical monitoring to assess the benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa1691
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of different ventilation modes of non-invasive ventilation in patients with hypercapnic-hypoxic ventilation failure – iVAPS vs. ST

Daniel Drömann, D Pawlak, Klaas Frederik Franzen, Tobias Jagomast et al.
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Influence of different ventilation modes of non-invasive ventilation in patients with hypercapnic-hypoxic ventilation failure – iVAPS vs. ST

Daniel Drömann, D Pawlak, Klaas Frederik Franzen, Tobias Jagomast, Lae‐Young Jung, Mareike Lüthgen, Isabell-Christin Scherer
article en

Abstract

<bold>Introduction:</bold> COPD is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Patients may develop hypercapnic-hypoxic respiratory failure with respiratory acidosis as the disease progresses at an advanced stage. Therefore, with this study, we address the question of whether a modern beaming mode "iVAPS" has an advantage over a conventional mode "ST". <bold>Methods:</bold> This prospective, randomized study with a cross-over design single-blind included 50 patients with COPD GOLD IV/E and hypercapnic-hypoxic ventilation failure at initiation of noninvasive ventilation. After randomization, ventilation was initiated in either ST or iVAPS mode and switched to the other mode after three months. Evaluation parameters included therapy adherence, CO2, quality of life, depression, arterial stiffness, echocardiographic parameters and the 6-minute walk test. <bold>Results:</bold> Results showed significantly better treatment adherence, higher quality of life and improved cognitive performance for iVAPS. The iVAPS mode also led to more effective CO2 elimination. In addition, depending on the duration of use and the mode, there was an advantage for the iVAPS mode in terms of the washed out CO2. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> The study concludes a clear benefit for iVAPS in terms of treatment adherence, quality of life, cognitive performance and mood, but recommends further long-term mortality studies and telemedical monitoring to assess the benefit.

Institute for Integrative and Experimental Genomics (DE), University of Lübeck (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.