How Mental Health Establishes ‘Vulnerability’ as the Basis for Support from a Housing Helpline: Self-Descriptions and Diagnostic Categories

In the UK, there is a greater prospect of receiving housing support if one is considered ‘vulnerable’—that is, at unusual risk. However, there can be a disparity between applicant and provider in the assessment of whether the applicant is indeed vulnerable. We investigate how one particular criterion, mental health, is constructed to reach the required threshold of “vulnerability.” On the one hand, callers brought up their mental health either (a) before articulating their reason for calling, or (b) to strengthen their entitlement to support. Call-takers, however, asked about callers’ mental health (a) as part of routine questioning or (b) as subsequently occasioned queries. Our findings show that, and how, mental health and ‘vulnerability’ formulations are produced, organized, and negotiated at the interactional (and institutional) boundaries of subjective experience and formal medical diagnosis, and in ways that afford or constrain the assistance offered. Data are in British English.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research on Language and Social Interaction
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2024.2410134
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Mental Health Establishes ‘Vulnerability’ as the Basis for Support from a Housing Helpline: Self-Descriptions and Diagnostic Categories

Marc Alexander, Elizabeth Stokoe, Derek Edwards
Research on Language and Social Interaction
Homelessness and Social Issues
article

How Mental Health Establishes ‘Vulnerability’ as the Basis for Support from a Housing Helpline: Self-Descriptions and Diagnostic Categories

Marc Alexander, Elizabeth Stokoe, Derek Edwards
article en

Abstract

In the UK, there is a greater prospect of receiving housing support if one is considered ‘vulnerable’—that is, at unusual risk. However, there can be a disparity between applicant and provider in the assessment of whether the applicant is indeed vulnerable. We investigate how one particular criterion, mental health, is constructed to reach the required threshold of “vulnerability.” On the one hand, callers brought up their mental health either (a) before articulating their reason for calling, or (b) to strengthen their entitlement to support. Call-takers, however, asked about callers’ mental health (a) as part of routine questioning or (b) as subsequently occasioned queries. Our findings show that, and how, mental health and ‘vulnerability’ formulations are produced, organized, and negotiated at the interactional (and institutional) boundaries of subjective experience and formal medical diagnosis, and in ways that afford or constrain the assistance offered. Data are in British English.

Research on Language and Social InteractionVol. 57(4)
Loughborough University (GB), Heriot-Watt University Malaysia (MY), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Homelessness and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.