The impact of immortal time bias on the estimated mortality benefit of antifibrotic therapy in IPF

<bold>Background:</bold> The survival benefit of antifibrotic therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains uncertain. The presence of immortal time bias in observational studies can overestimate the mortality benefit. This occurs where patients are classified as “treated” from the start of observation, instead of being reclassified at start of treatment, creating a period of immortality. <bold>Objective:</bold> Assess the mortality benefit of antifibrotic therapy while accounting for immortal time bias. <bold>Methods:</bold> IPF patients (N=969) from Nordic registries were included in a retrospective cohort study. The time-dependent effect of antifibrotic treatment on transplant-free survival (TFS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. <bold>Results:</bold> Of 969 patients, 803 (83%) received nintedanib or pirfenidone. Treatment was associated with lower mortality when assessed as a time-dependent variable, with median TFS 4.6 years on treatment and 3.6 years without treatment (p=0.006). Treatment was not associated with survival benefit after adjustment for age, FVC and DLCO. By contrast, median TFS appeared to be 4.7 years among treated and 2.2 years among untreated patients when not accounting for immortal time bias (Figure). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Immortal time bias appears to inflate the apparent mortality benefit of antifibrotic therapy in IPF, and should be accounted for in observational studies. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA2433/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa2433
Primary Topic
Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of immortal time bias on the estimated mortality benefit of antifibrotic therapy in IPF

Phuong Phuong Diep, Michael T. Durheim, Elisabeth Bendstrup, Dimitrios Kalafatis et al.
Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
article

The impact of immortal time bias on the estimated mortality benefit of antifibrotic therapy in IPF

Phuong Phuong Diep, Michael T. Durheim, Elisabeth Bendstrup, Dimitrios Kalafatis, Ida Pesonen, Charlotte Hyldgaard, Lisa Carlson, Nils Hoyer, Magnus Sköld, Saher Burhan Shaker, Marit Bjørnå Wilskow
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> The survival benefit of antifibrotic therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains uncertain. The presence of immortal time bias in observational studies can overestimate the mortality benefit. This occurs where patients are classified as “treated” from the start of observation, instead of being reclassified at start of treatment, creating a period of immortality. <bold>Objective:</bold> Assess the mortality benefit of antifibrotic therapy while accounting for immortal time bias. <bold>Methods:</bold> IPF patients (N=969) from Nordic registries were included in a retrospective cohort study. The time-dependent effect of antifibrotic treatment on transplant-free survival (TFS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. <bold>Results:</bold> Of 969 patients, 803 (83%) received nintedanib or pirfenidone. Treatment was associated with lower mortality when assessed as a time-dependent variable, with median TFS 4.6 years on treatment and 3.6 years without treatment (p=0.006). Treatment was not associated with survival benefit after adjustment for age, FVC and DLCO. By contrast, median TFS appeared to be 4.7 years among treated and 2.2 years among untreated patients when not accounting for immortal time bias (Figure). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Immortal time bias appears to inflate the apparent mortality benefit of antifibrotic therapy in IPF, and should be accounted for in observational studies. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA2433/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Oslo University Hospital (NO), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Aarhus University (DK), Gentofte Hospital (DK), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Nordland Hospital (NO), Regionshospitalet Silkeborg (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.