The Pulmonary Hypertension Global Patient Survey (PH GPS): an overview and results

<bold>Background:</bold> Patients’ experience of living with pulmonary hypertension (PH) is likely to vary within & between countries. <bold>Aim:</bold> To conduct the first global survey to understand patients’ perspectives of living with PH. <bold>Methods:</bold> PH GPS was drafted via an iterative consensus-building process by a multi-disciplinary panel: physicians, nurses, researchers, patients & advocates from Pulmonary Hypertension Associations (PHAs). Overseen by PVRI & endorsed by ERN-Lung. Themes include diagnosis, treatment, quality of life, research participation & digital health. It was translated then beta-tested by patients. The online survey had 3 parallel streams: adult patients, carers/relatives of adult patients & parents/guardians of paediatric patients, with different arms tailored to specific PH groups. Disseminated by PHAs via traditional/social media. <bold>Results:</bold> In the first 2 months, there were 3366 responders (3193 adults: 82.3% female, mean age 51.8y, 57% Group 1 PAH, 79% survey completion rate) with ~100 data points each, from 5 continents, 88 countries & 17 languages. Figure1 is an example of early novel results of the global PH patient community’s participation in clinical trials. Data is pending from 7 more languages. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> The high global response rate & depth of PH GPS data allow novel & important insights to be made which will inform international guidelines, research priorities & health policy, to improve care & outcomes worldwide. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA2501/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa2501
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Pulmonary Hypertension Global Patient Survey (PH GPS): an overview and results

Luke Howard, Joanna Pepke‐Żaba, Joseph Newman, Marisa Granato et al.
1 citations
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
0.42
article

The Pulmonary Hypertension Global Patient Survey (PH GPS): an overview and results

Luke Howard, Joanna Pepke‐Żaba, Joseph Newman, Marisa Granato, Marcin Kurzyna, Mark R. Toshner, G. Fischer, Gergely Mészáros, Lynsay MacDonald, Millicent Stone, Monika Tschida, Eva Otter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Patients’ experience of living with pulmonary hypertension (PH) is likely to vary within & between countries. <bold>Aim:</bold> To conduct the first global survey to understand patients’ perspectives of living with PH. <bold>Methods:</bold> PH GPS was drafted via an iterative consensus-building process by a multi-disciplinary panel: physicians, nurses, researchers, patients & advocates from Pulmonary Hypertension Associations (PHAs). Overseen by PVRI & endorsed by ERN-Lung. Themes include diagnosis, treatment, quality of life, research participation & digital health. It was translated then beta-tested by patients. The online survey had 3 parallel streams: adult patients, carers/relatives of adult patients & parents/guardians of paediatric patients, with different arms tailored to specific PH groups. Disseminated by PHAs via traditional/social media. <bold>Results:</bold> In the first 2 months, there were 3366 responders (3193 adults: 82.3% female, mean age 51.8y, 57% Group 1 PAH, 79% survey completion rate) with ~100 data points each, from 5 continents, 88 countries & 17 languages. Figure1 is an example of early novel results of the global PH patient community’s participation in clinical trials. Data is pending from 7 more languages. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> The high global response rate & depth of PH GPS data allow novel & important insights to be made which will inform international guidelines, research priorities & health policy, to improve care & outcomes worldwide. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA2501/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Mt. Washington Pediatric Hospital (US), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Sarah Cannon Research Institute (GB), Royal Papworth Hospital (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), National Centre for Nuclear Research (PL), Kirchliche Pädagogische Hochschule Wien/Niederösterreich (AT), Cardiovascular Center Frankfurt (DE), Sustainable Europe Research Institute (AT), University College London (GB), University of Bath (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.