Assessment of strain effects of normal values of respiratory mechanics in rats

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Normal values are routinely used in interpreting lung function tests. While several studies have established reference values for human patients, such values have not been characterized in common animal models. Therefore, our aim was to establish normal values of respiratory mechanical parameters in the two most common rat strains used in respiratory research. <bold>Methods:</bold> Healthy male Sprague-Dawley (SPRD, n=53) and Wistar (WIST, n=30) rats were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated. Respiratory mechanics were measured by forced oscillations at increasing PEEP levels of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. The constant phase model was fitted to the impedance spectra, then airway resistance (Raw) and tissue elastance (H) were identified. Reference equations were determined for Raw and H by using mixed-effect multiple regression models for each strain with predictors PEEP, square root (SQRT) of body mass and their interaction. <bold>Results:</bold> The models for Raw and H fitted well for both strains with high R<sup>2</sup> values and normally distributed residuals. Multivariate mixed-model ANCOVA revealed a significant interaction between the predictor variables and strain (p=0.03) for Raw but not for H (p=0.56). <bold>Conclusions:</bold> In our ongoing study we have found significant differences in models predicting Raw values of male SPRD and WIST rats, suggesting that strain needs to be considered for reference equations for Raw, while prediction of H is not affected by strain. <bold>Funding:</bold> OTKA-NKFIH FK134274 <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA2602/TB1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>TB1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td>ln(X) = <bold>a</bold>*SQRT(mass[g]) + <bold>b</bold>*PEEP[cmH<sub>2</sub>O] + <bold>c</bold>*PEEP[cmH<sub>2</sub>O]*SQRT(mass[g]) + <bold>d</bold></td></tr><tr><td><bold>X</bold></td><td><bold>Strain</bold></td><td><bold>a</bold></td><td><bold>b</bold></td><td><bold>c</bold></td><td><bold>d</bold></td><td><bold>R<sup>2</sup></bold></td></tr><tr><td><bold>Raw</bold> (cmH<sub>2</sub>O.s/l)</td><td>SPRD</td><td>-0.064</td><td>-0.202</td><td>0.001</td><td>5.456</td><td>0.89</td></tr><tr><td>WIST</td><td>-0.067</td><td>-0.312</td><td>0.009</td><td>5.410</td><td>0.85</td></tr><tr><td><bold>H</bold> (cmH<sub>2</sub>O/l)</td><td>BOTH</td><td>-0.087</td><td>-0.199</td><td>0.002</td><td>9.929</td><td>0.95</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa2602
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of strain effects of normal values of respiratory mechanics in rats

Bence Ballók, Gergely H. Fodor, Ferenc Rárosi, Ferenc Peták et al.
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Assessment of strain effects of normal values of respiratory mechanics in rats

Bence Ballók, Gergely H. Fodor, Ferenc Rárosi, Ferenc Peták, Petra Somogyi, Fruzsina Kun-Szabó
article en

Abstract

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Normal values are routinely used in interpreting lung function tests. While several studies have established reference values for human patients, such values have not been characterized in common animal models. Therefore, our aim was to establish normal values of respiratory mechanical parameters in the two most common rat strains used in respiratory research. <bold>Methods:</bold> Healthy male Sprague-Dawley (SPRD, n=53) and Wistar (WIST, n=30) rats were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated. Respiratory mechanics were measured by forced oscillations at increasing PEEP levels of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. The constant phase model was fitted to the impedance spectra, then airway resistance (Raw) and tissue elastance (H) were identified. Reference equations were determined for Raw and H by using mixed-effect multiple regression models for each strain with predictors PEEP, square root (SQRT) of body mass and their interaction. <bold>Results:</bold> The models for Raw and H fitted well for both strains with high R<sup>2</sup> values and normally distributed residuals. Multivariate mixed-model ANCOVA revealed a significant interaction between the predictor variables and strain (p=0.03) for Raw but not for H (p=0.56). <bold>Conclusions:</bold> In our ongoing study we have found significant differences in models predicting Raw values of male SPRD and WIST rats, suggesting that strain needs to be considered for reference equations for Raw, while prediction of H is not affected by strain. <bold>Funding:</bold> OTKA-NKFIH FK134274 <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA2602/TB1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>TB1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td>ln(X) = <bold>a</bold>*SQRT(mass[g]) + <bold>b</bold>*PEEP[cmH<sub>2</sub>O] + <bold>c</bold>*PEEP[cmH<sub>2</sub>O]*SQRT(mass[g]) + <bold>d</bold></td></tr><tr><td><bold>X</bold></td><td><bold>Strain</bold></td><td><bold>a</bold></td><td><bold>b</bold></td><td><bold>c</bold></td><td><bold>d</bold></td><td><bold>R<sup>2</sup></bold></td></tr><tr><td><bold>Raw</bold> (cmH<sub>2</sub>O.s/l)</td><td>SPRD</td><td>-0.064</td><td>-0.202</td><td>0.001</td><td>5.456</td><td>0.89</td></tr><tr><td>WIST</td><td>-0.067</td><td>-0.312</td><td>0.009</td><td>5.410</td><td>0.85</td></tr><tr><td><bold>H</bold> (cmH<sub>2</sub>O/l)</td><td>BOTH</td><td>-0.087</td><td>-0.199</td><td>0.002</td><td>9.929</td><td>0.95</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>

University of Szeged (HU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.