‘Train to Drain’: a Quality Improvement Project to Improve the Confidence of Doctors and Nurses in Managing Patients with Chest Drains

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Chest drain is a common procedure to drain pleural effusion in an acute hospital setting but there are limited educational resources available to train medical staff in the management of chest drains to ensure safe practice. <bold>Methods:</bold> We conducted a Quality Improvement Project (QIP) to improve the confidence of doctors and nurses in managing patients with chest drains in medical wards. A driver diagram was used to plan intervention of regular teaching sessions and a PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) framework was employed to assess the impact in small group teaching. Issues of teaching slots, frequency, retention of knowledge and staff turnover were identified for regular teaching intervention. Discussions with key stakeholders identified essential training areas in managing chest drains and alternative teaching approaches. Customised educational videos were developed for the identified training areas to support on-demand learning. The impact was assessed in a PDSA cycle using videos for training with pre- and post-matched surveys. <bold>Results:</bold> The surveys demonstrated an overall improvement in the confidence of medical staff in managing chest drains by using focused training videos (Fig. 1a, b). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> This QIP highlights the positive impact of targeted educational interventions to improve patient safety by using sustainable, cost-effective resources. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA2578/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa2578
Primary Topic
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Train to Drain’: a Quality Improvement Project to Improve the Confidence of Doctors and Nurses in Managing Patients with Chest Drains

Beenish Iqbal, Suzy Guo, Rob Hallifax, Anand Sundaralingam et al.
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
article

‘Train to Drain’: a Quality Improvement Project to Improve the Confidence of Doctors and Nurses in Managing Patients with Chest Drains

Beenish Iqbal, Suzy Guo, Rob Hallifax, Anand Sundaralingam, Najib Mahboob Rahman, Dinesh Addala, Alguili Elsheikh, John Wrightson
article en

Abstract

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Chest drain is a common procedure to drain pleural effusion in an acute hospital setting but there are limited educational resources available to train medical staff in the management of chest drains to ensure safe practice. <bold>Methods:</bold> We conducted a Quality Improvement Project (QIP) to improve the confidence of doctors and nurses in managing patients with chest drains in medical wards. A driver diagram was used to plan intervention of regular teaching sessions and a PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) framework was employed to assess the impact in small group teaching. Issues of teaching slots, frequency, retention of knowledge and staff turnover were identified for regular teaching intervention. Discussions with key stakeholders identified essential training areas in managing chest drains and alternative teaching approaches. Customised educational videos were developed for the identified training areas to support on-demand learning. The impact was assessed in a PDSA cycle using videos for training with pre- and post-matched surveys. <bold>Results:</bold> The surveys demonstrated an overall improvement in the confidence of medical staff in managing chest drains by using focused training videos (Fig. 1a, b). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> This QIP highlights the positive impact of targeted educational interventions to improve patient safety by using sustainable, cost-effective resources. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA2578/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Respiratory Clinical Trials (GB), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.