Abnormal ventilatory responses during cardiopulmonary exercise testing in children with upper airway obstruction. Why am I short of breath when I have a large reserve?

<bold>Background:</bold> Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is used to assess for ventilatory limitation. This will often be identified by a breathing reserve (BR%) <15% of the maximal voluntary ventilation. We have identified a cohort of patients with varying diagnoses which cause upper airway obstruction (UAO) who display abnormal ventilatory responses during CPET and evidence of ventilatory limitation with a high BR%. <bold>Aim:</bold> To evaluate the ventilatory responses during CPET in children with UAO and compare this to a control group (CON). To describe a unique pattern of ventilation during CPET in UAO. <bold>Methods:</bold> A retrospective analysis of results from patients referred from Ear Nose & throat with UAO. These were compared to a CON group who had been referred for CPET with exercise induced dyspnoea. <bold>Results:</bold> 13 patients with UAO performed CPET (4 males) and 13 age & sex matched CONs. Mean age was 12.4 ±2.9. Results from peak exercise are shown in the table. The UAO group had a significantly lower VO<sub>2peak</sub> (VO<sub>2</sub>%), peak ventilation (V<sub>Epeak</sub>), breathing frequency (BF), higher BR% and end tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (ETCO<sub>2)</sub> (p<0.05). Mean & 95%CI <bold>Discussion:</bold> We have shown that UAO shows a unique pattern of ventilatory limitation during CPET. This is presented as low peak ventilation which is primarily due to a low breathing frequency. This results in elevated CO<sub>2</sub> levels, a high BR% and the inability to achieve a RCP. <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA2606/TB1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>TB1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td></td><td>UAO</td><td>CON</td></tr><tr><td>VO2%</td><td>80 (67, 92)</td><td>114 (100, 127)</td></tr><tr><td>V<sub>Epeak</sub>(L/min)</td><td>39 (31, 46)</td><td>73 (59, 87)</td></tr><tr><td>BF(min<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td>35 (30, 40)</td><td>55 (49, 61)</td></tr><tr><td>Tidal Volume(ml/min)</td><td>1115 (952, 1276)</td><td>1373 (1083, 1664)</td></tr><tr><td>BR%</td><td>44 (37, 50)</td><td>26 (19, 32)</td></tr><tr><td>ETCO<sub>2</sub>(kPa)</td><td>5.44 (5.05, 5.83)</td><td>4.38 (4.06, 4.70)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa2606
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abnormal ventilatory responses during cardiopulmonary exercise testing in children with upper airway obstruction. Why am I short of breath when I have a large reserve?

Paul Burns, David Wynne, P. S. W. Davies, Ross Langley
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Abnormal ventilatory responses during cardiopulmonary exercise testing in children with upper airway obstruction. Why am I short of breath when I have a large reserve?

Paul Burns, David Wynne, P. S. W. Davies, Ross Langley
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is used to assess for ventilatory limitation. This will often be identified by a breathing reserve (BR%) <15% of the maximal voluntary ventilation. We have identified a cohort of patients with varying diagnoses which cause upper airway obstruction (UAO) who display abnormal ventilatory responses during CPET and evidence of ventilatory limitation with a high BR%. <bold>Aim:</bold> To evaluate the ventilatory responses during CPET in children with UAO and compare this to a control group (CON). To describe a unique pattern of ventilation during CPET in UAO. <bold>Methods:</bold> A retrospective analysis of results from patients referred from Ear Nose & throat with UAO. These were compared to a CON group who had been referred for CPET with exercise induced dyspnoea. <bold>Results:</bold> 13 patients with UAO performed CPET (4 males) and 13 age & sex matched CONs. Mean age was 12.4 ±2.9. Results from peak exercise are shown in the table. The UAO group had a significantly lower VO<sub>2peak</sub> (VO<sub>2</sub>%), peak ventilation (V<sub>Epeak</sub>), breathing frequency (BF), higher BR% and end tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (ETCO<sub>2)</sub> (p<0.05). Mean & 95%CI <bold>Discussion:</bold> We have shown that UAO shows a unique pattern of ventilatory limitation during CPET. This is presented as low peak ventilation which is primarily due to a low breathing frequency. This results in elevated CO<sub>2</sub> levels, a high BR% and the inability to achieve a RCP. <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA2606/TB1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>TB1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td></td><td>UAO</td><td>CON</td></tr><tr><td>VO2%</td><td>80 (67, 92)</td><td>114 (100, 127)</td></tr><tr><td>V<sub>Epeak</sub>(L/min)</td><td>39 (31, 46)</td><td>73 (59, 87)</td></tr><tr><td>BF(min<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td>35 (30, 40)</td><td>55 (49, 61)</td></tr><tr><td>Tidal Volume(ml/min)</td><td>1115 (952, 1276)</td><td>1373 (1083, 1664)</td></tr><tr><td>BR%</td><td>44 (37, 50)</td><td>26 (19, 32)</td></tr><tr><td>ETCO<sub>2</sub>(kPa)</td><td>5.44 (5.05, 5.83)</td><td>4.38 (4.06, 4.70)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>

Royal Hospital for Children (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.