Sleep Environment in an Tertiary Intensive Care Unit during a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

<bold>Background:</bold> Sleep disturbances are highly prevalent among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and are strongly associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Understanding challenges of the ICU environment holds promise for mitigating these disturbances and ultimately improving patient outcomes. <bold>Objectives:</bold> This study aims to provide a detailed description of a cohort of ICU patients and elucidate the components of sleep environment, specifically light and noise. <bold>Methods:</bold> Data was collected from participants enrolled in a double-blind randomized controlled trial entitled “Exogenous Melatonin in Intensive Care Unit Chronodisruption-EMIC” (clinicaltrials.gov: <ext-link>NCT03708341</ext-link>). Descriptive data regarding patient demographics was documented. One-hour periods of illuminance and sound levels were recorded at the same hour twice daily (12AM-12PM) throughout the length of stay. <bold>Results:</bold> 163 patients were included in the study (54.6% male; mean age 67 ± 17 years). The mean APACHE II score for disease severity was 15 ± 6, the mean SOFA score was 5 ± 3, with a mean length of stay of 4 ± 5 days. Results are presented in Table 1. <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA2689/TB1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>TB1</object-id><label>Table 1</label><caption> Mean illuminance and sound levels </caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td><bold>Sound (dB)<sup>1</sup></bold></td><td><bold>Illuminance (lux)<sup>2</sup></bold></td></tr><tr><td><bold>AM</bold></td><td><bold>PM</bold></td><td><bold>AM</bold></td><td><bold>PM</bold></td></tr><tr><td><bold>Min</bold></td><td><bold>Max</bold></td><td><bold>Min</bold></td><td><bold>Max</bold></td><td><bold>Min</bold></td><td><bold>Max</bold></td><td><bold>Min</bold></td><td><bold>Max</bold></td></tr><tr><td>45.3</td><td>79.2</td><td>48</td><td>90.1</td><td>40</td><td>108.7</td><td>109.2</td><td>264.8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> <sup>1. WHO threshold 45 dB for non-continuous noise to avoid negative sleep disturbances.</sup> <sup>2. 100 Lux is the minimal luminosity for reading.</sup> <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Despite protocol efforts to control environmental factors, noise levels persist above the recommended WHO standards. Our study highlights suboptimal daytime luminosity and excessive nighttime luminosity, which may contribute to chronodisruption among patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa2689
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sleep Environment in an Tertiary Intensive Care Unit during a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Ihab Ibrahim, Marc Raad, Jocelyne Abou Jaoude, Almoaidbellah Rammal et al.
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Sleep Environment in an Tertiary Intensive Care Unit during a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Ihab Ibrahim, Marc Raad, Jocelyne Abou Jaoude, Almoaidbellah Rammal, Samer Najem, Moussa Riachy, Aline Hajj, Albert Riachy, Ghassan Sleilaty, Rita Khoury, Roula Bou Serhal, Jamile Douaihy, Tamine Massoud, Sabrina Nasreddine, Andrea Maalouf, Fabienne Hajj Moussa Lteif
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Sleep disturbances are highly prevalent among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and are strongly associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Understanding challenges of the ICU environment holds promise for mitigating these disturbances and ultimately improving patient outcomes. <bold>Objectives:</bold> This study aims to provide a detailed description of a cohort of ICU patients and elucidate the components of sleep environment, specifically light and noise. <bold>Methods:</bold> Data was collected from participants enrolled in a double-blind randomized controlled trial entitled “Exogenous Melatonin in Intensive Care Unit Chronodisruption-EMIC” (clinicaltrials.gov: <ext-link>NCT03708341</ext-link>). Descriptive data regarding patient demographics was documented. One-hour periods of illuminance and sound levels were recorded at the same hour twice daily (12AM-12PM) throughout the length of stay. <bold>Results:</bold> 163 patients were included in the study (54.6% male; mean age 67 ± 17 years). The mean APACHE II score for disease severity was 15 ± 6, the mean SOFA score was 5 ± 3, with a mean length of stay of 4 ± 5 days. Results are presented in Table 1. <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA2689/TB1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>TB1</object-id><label>Table 1</label><caption> Mean illuminance and sound levels </caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td><bold>Sound (dB)<sup>1</sup></bold></td><td><bold>Illuminance (lux)<sup>2</sup></bold></td></tr><tr><td><bold>AM</bold></td><td><bold>PM</bold></td><td><bold>AM</bold></td><td><bold>PM</bold></td></tr><tr><td><bold>Min</bold></td><td><bold>Max</bold></td><td><bold>Min</bold></td><td><bold>Max</bold></td><td><bold>Min</bold></td><td><bold>Max</bold></td><td><bold>Min</bold></td><td><bold>Max</bold></td></tr><tr><td>45.3</td><td>79.2</td><td>48</td><td>90.1</td><td>40</td><td>108.7</td><td>109.2</td><td>264.8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> <sup>1. WHO threshold 45 dB for non-continuous noise to avoid negative sleep disturbances.</sup> <sup>2. 100 Lux is the minimal luminosity for reading.</sup> <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Despite protocol efforts to control environmental factors, noise levels persist above the recommended WHO standards. Our study highlights suboptimal daytime luminosity and excessive nighttime luminosity, which may contribute to chronodisruption among patients.

Saint Joseph University (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.