Response to a bronchodilator in oscillometry: time to avoid cutoff values?

A crucial use of oscillometry is evaluation of the response to a short-acting bronchodilator (BDR). The last technical oscillometry recommendations highlight the necessity to obtain reference values of BDR in a healthy population, including the upper or lower limits of normal (ULN or LLN). <bold>Aim:</bold> To describe the BDR in all oscillometry variables. <bold>Methods:</bold> Healthy respiratory children and adults were recruited. After signing an informed consent, oscillometry were performed before (pre) and after (post) inhalation of 400 µg salbutamol according to international standards. BDR was calculated in four ways: A) [post minus pre]/predicted; B) [post minus pre]/pre; C) post minus pre, and D) z-score post minus z-score pre. <bold>Results:</bold> 434 subjects, 5-93 years, 54% female, were included. Formulas A and B yielded many indeterminate or inflated BDR, specially in reactances, due to values close to zero. Formula C is feasible but does not adjust by the basal status. Thus, we used z-scores (formula D) to calculate ULN and LLN for each variable. However, it was evident that BDR is a continuum, ranging from subjects who have better lung function after salbutamol to those in whom lung function worsens (figure). Thus, cut off values for ULN and LLN seem arbitrary and do not reflect the continuum of BDR. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> The calculation of reference values for BDR using z-scores seems to be appropriate, but its report in an “all or none” fashion should be avoided. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA3464/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa3464
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response to a bronchodilator in oscillometry: time to avoid cutoff values?

Selene Guerrero‐Zúñiga, Mario H. Vargas, Luis is Torre-Bouscoulet, David Martínez‐Briseño et al.
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Response to a bronchodilator in oscillometry: time to avoid cutoff values?

Selene Guerrero‐Zúñiga, Mario H. Vargas, Luis is Torre-Bouscoulet, David Martínez‐Briseño, Irlanda Alvarado-Amador, Gustavo I. Centeno-Saenz, Laura Rangel, Rosario Fernández-Plata, Diana Montserrat Riego-Ramírez
article en

Abstract

A crucial use of oscillometry is evaluation of the response to a short-acting bronchodilator (BDR). The last technical oscillometry recommendations highlight the necessity to obtain reference values of BDR in a healthy population, including the upper or lower limits of normal (ULN or LLN). <bold>Aim:</bold> To describe the BDR in all oscillometry variables. <bold>Methods:</bold> Healthy respiratory children and adults were recruited. After signing an informed consent, oscillometry were performed before (pre) and after (post) inhalation of 400 µg salbutamol according to international standards. BDR was calculated in four ways: A) [post minus pre]/predicted; B) [post minus pre]/pre; C) post minus pre, and D) z-score post minus z-score pre. <bold>Results:</bold> 434 subjects, 5-93 years, 54% female, were included. Formulas A and B yielded many indeterminate or inflated BDR, specially in reactances, due to values close to zero. Formula C is feasible but does not adjust by the basal status. Thus, we used z-scores (formula D) to calculate ULN and LLN for each variable. However, it was evident that BDR is a continuum, ranging from subjects who have better lung function after salbutamol to those in whom lung function worsens (figure). Thus, cut off values for ULN and LLN seem arbitrary and do not reflect the continuum of BDR. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> The calculation of reference values for BDR using z-scores seems to be appropriate, but its report in an “all or none” fashion should be avoided. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA3464/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias (MX), Center for Engineering and Industrial Development (MX)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.