Indwelling pleural catheter infection rate - a single centre experience in a tertiary care Hospital – UK

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) are frequently used safely as a long-term strategy for managing recurrent malignant and sometimes non-malignant pleural effusion. Although, complications can occur. Pleural infection is reported to occur in less than 5% of patients and usually responds to antibiotics and catheter removal. Rarely, surgery may be required. This study aims to determine the incidence of IPC infection in modern tertiary centre practice and examine for associations with use of systemic anticancer therapy (SACT). <bold>Methods:</bold> A retrospective study was conducted at Oxford University Hospitals to review outcomes of all IPCs inserted between January 2019 and December 2022. <bold>Results:</bold> 244 IPCS were reviewed; 67% were male and the rate of IPC infection was 15, 6.1%. Median time to infection was 58 days(IQR 18 – 247) after IPC insertion. 6, 40% displaying microbiological culture positivity. In 12, 80% of cases, IPC removal was required alongside antibiotics, and 5, 33% required intrapleural fibrinolytics. No patient required surgery. IPC infection in malignant effusions Of all infection patients, 10, 67% had underlying malignancies. 7, 70 % were on SACT when they developed a pleural infection vs 3,30% who were not on SACT (p=0.200, 2 df, chi squared test). IPC infection in non-malignant effusions All patients with non-malignant effusion developed an infection (5). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> IPCs insertion for non malignant effusions should be cautiously considered, as the proportion of patients on SACT with IPC-related infection was higher than those not on treatment. However, this is not statistically significant, and larger, prospective studies are required to delineate this.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa3355
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indwelling pleural catheter infection rate - a single centre experience in a tertiary care Hospital – UK

Beenish Iqbal, Ken Junyang Goh, Rob Hallifax, Anand Sundaralingam et al.
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Indwelling pleural catheter infection rate - a single centre experience in a tertiary care Hospital – UK

Beenish Iqbal, Ken Junyang Goh, Rob Hallifax, Anand Sundaralingam, Najib Mahboob Rahman, Dinesh Addala, Alguili Elsheikh, W Chew, John Wrightson
article en

Abstract

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) are frequently used safely as a long-term strategy for managing recurrent malignant and sometimes non-malignant pleural effusion. Although, complications can occur. Pleural infection is reported to occur in less than 5% of patients and usually responds to antibiotics and catheter removal. Rarely, surgery may be required. This study aims to determine the incidence of IPC infection in modern tertiary centre practice and examine for associations with use of systemic anticancer therapy (SACT). <bold>Methods:</bold> A retrospective study was conducted at Oxford University Hospitals to review outcomes of all IPCs inserted between January 2019 and December 2022. <bold>Results:</bold> 244 IPCS were reviewed; 67% were male and the rate of IPC infection was 15, 6.1%. Median time to infection was 58 days(IQR 18 – 247) after IPC insertion. 6, 40% displaying microbiological culture positivity. In 12, 80% of cases, IPC removal was required alongside antibiotics, and 5, 33% required intrapleural fibrinolytics. No patient required surgery. IPC infection in malignant effusions Of all infection patients, 10, 67% had underlying malignancies. 7, 70 % were on SACT when they developed a pleural infection vs 3,30% who were not on SACT (p=0.200, 2 df, chi squared test). IPC infection in non-malignant effusions All patients with non-malignant effusion developed an infection (5). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> IPCs insertion for non malignant effusions should be cautiously considered, as the proportion of patients on SACT with IPC-related infection was higher than those not on treatment. However, this is not statistically significant, and larger, prospective studies are required to delineate this.

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.