Physician- and model-reported factors to identify pulmonary hypertension associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (PH-COPD)

<bold>Background:</bold> Due to frequent misdiagnosis, invasive diagnostic tests, and lack of approved therapies, screening for PH among patients with COPD is not routinely performed. Machine learning models can aid in detection of PH-COPD, but it is unclear how model features compare to factors used in clinical decision making. <bold>Methods:</bold> A Delphi Panel of PH physicians identified key clinical factors associated with PH-COPD. A machine learning model was trained to identify patients using data from the year prior to PH diagnosis (area under the curve 0.80, sensitivity 72%, specificity 71%). Features included demographics, medications, procedures, imaging/laboratory tests, symptoms, and healthcare utilization. Frequencies of physician-reported factors were compared to model features. <bold>Results and Conclusion:</bold> Physicians reported 6 clinical factors with ≥50% agreement, 4 of which were eligible for model training and found to be significant (Table). High concordance between physicians and model feature importance could improve adoption of models to identify patients with PH-COPD and support their clinical relevance. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA3434/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa3434
Primary Topic
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physician- and model-reported factors to identify pulmonary hypertension associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (PH-COPD)

Hilary M. DuBrock, Hari Bandi, Tracey Weiss, Katherine Carlson et al.
1 links
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
article

Physician- and model-reported factors to identify pulmonary hypertension associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (PH-COPD)

Hilary M. DuBrock, Hari Bandi, Tracey Weiss, Katherine Carlson, Hannah Barman, Boshu Ru, Catelyn Coyle, Tyler Wagner, Kathryn Del Valle, Mithun Manoharan, Dena Rosen Ramey
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Due to frequent misdiagnosis, invasive diagnostic tests, and lack of approved therapies, screening for PH among patients with COPD is not routinely performed. Machine learning models can aid in detection of PH-COPD, but it is unclear how model features compare to factors used in clinical decision making. <bold>Methods:</bold> A Delphi Panel of PH physicians identified key clinical factors associated with PH-COPD. A machine learning model was trained to identify patients using data from the year prior to PH diagnosis (area under the curve 0.80, sensitivity 72%, specificity 71%). Features included demographics, medications, procedures, imaging/laboratory tests, symptoms, and healthcare utilization. Frequencies of physician-reported factors were compared to model features. <bold>Results and Conclusion:</bold> Physicians reported 6 clinical factors with ≥50% agreement, 4 of which were eligible for model training and found to be significant (Table). High concordance between physicians and model feature importance could improve adoption of models to identify patients with PH-COPD and support their clinical relevance. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA3434/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

University of Minnesota Rochester (US), Merck Institute for Science Education (US), Nference (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.