LEXICAL STANDARDIZATION AND USAGE RECOMMENDATIONS THROUGH THE EYES OF AN ETYMOLOGIST (COMMENTS, REFLECTIONS, EVALUATIONS)

The article addresses the issue of the professionalism of cultural-language recommendations, criteria for lexical standardization, and the assessment of words as acceptable or unacceptable, considering their origin — whether native or borrowed. In the context of the trend towards differentiation from the Russian language, the authors of cultural-linguistic recommendations urge avoiding linguistic units shared with Russian and replacing them with different equivalents. It is shown that this trend extends not only to genuine Russianisms but also to words of East Slavic, Common Slavic, and even Indo- European origin. These words are mistakenly perceived not as native Ukrainian but as imposed Russian. The need to distinguish between genuine and perceived Russianisms in the process of standardization is emphasized.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Movoznavstvo
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33190/0027-2833-337-2024-4-001
Primary Topic
Lexicography and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LEXICAL STANDARDIZATION AND USAGE RECOMMENDATIONS THROUGH THE EYES OF AN ETYMOLOGIST (COMMENTS, REFLECTIONS, EVALUATIONS)

Pylyp SELIHEY
Movoznavstvo
Lexicography and Language Studies
article

LEXICAL STANDARDIZATION AND USAGE RECOMMENDATIONS THROUGH THE EYES OF AN ETYMOLOGIST (COMMENTS, REFLECTIONS, EVALUATIONS)

Pylyp SELIHEY
article en

Abstract

The article addresses the issue of the professionalism of cultural-language recommendations, criteria for lexical standardization, and the assessment of words as acceptable or unacceptable, considering their origin — whether native or borrowed. In the context of the trend towards differentiation from the Russian language, the authors of cultural-linguistic recommendations urge avoiding linguistic units shared with Russian and replacing them with different equivalents. It is shown that this trend extends not only to genuine Russianisms but also to words of East Slavic, Common Slavic, and even Indo- European origin. These words are mistakenly perceived not as native Ukrainian but as imposed Russian. The need to distinguish between genuine and perceived Russianisms in the process of standardization is emphasized.

MovoznavstvoVol. 337(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Lexicography and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.