Pressure transmission in the upper airways during Inspiratory muscle training (IMT).

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Laryngoscopy has revealed variable laryngeal responses to Inspiratory Muscle Training (IMT), where higher resistances might lead to adverse vocal fold adduction. Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) manoeuvres are used to guide IMT pressure settings. To effectively use IMT in treating patients with Exercise-Induced Laryngeal Obstruction (EILO), we need better insight into the dynamics of pressure transmission within the upper airways during a MIP manoeuvre. <bold>Aims:</bold> To address feasibility of measuring pressures in the trachea during MIP manoeuvres, and to investigate the pressure transmission within the upper airways in healthy volunteers. <bold>Methods:</bold> Ten healthy volunteers were included in this cross-sectional study. Pressure was measured: 1) by the mouthpiece (PowerBreath KHP②), 2) above the larynx (epiglottis) and 3) in the trachea (pressure transducers positioned via trans-nasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy). The participants performed 3-10 MIP manoeuvres until they reached their peak MIP. <bold>Results:</bold> Ten adults (6 females), aged 23-65 years performed in total 48 MIP manoeuvres. Findings presented in Table 1. <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA4142/T1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>t1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td>Sensor position</td><td>Mean cm H<sub>2</sub>O ± SD</td><td>Minimum MIP cm H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td>Maximum MIP cm H<sub>2</sub>O</td></tr><tr><td>Mouthpiece</td><td>−81.76 ± 25.6</td><td>−30.31</td><td>−137.6</td></tr><tr><td>Epiglottis</td><td>−85.41 ± 25.6</td><td>−37.72</td><td>−140.9</td></tr><tr><td>Trachea</td><td>−86.05 ± 24.3</td><td>−39.66</td><td>−139.4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> Table 1: Maximal inspiratory pressures (MIP), measured at the mouthpiece, epiglottis, and trachea. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> Measuuring tracheal pressure during MIP is possible. Mean pressures were more negative in the trachea than at the mouthpiece, with high standard deviations. The large variability needs to be addressed in future studies, as this may be related to variable laryngeal responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa4142
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pressure transmission in the upper airways during Inspiratory muscle training (IMT).

Anne Kristine Brekka, Ola Drange Roksund, Thomas Halvorsen, Piergiorgio Solli et al.
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Pressure transmission in the upper airways during Inspiratory muscle training (IMT).

Anne Kristine Brekka, Ola Drange Roksund, Thomas Halvorsen, Piergiorgio Solli, Hege Clemm, Astrid Sandnes, Merete Salveson Engeset, Tiina Andersen, Maria Vollseter
article en

Abstract

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Laryngoscopy has revealed variable laryngeal responses to Inspiratory Muscle Training (IMT), where higher resistances might lead to adverse vocal fold adduction. Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) manoeuvres are used to guide IMT pressure settings. To effectively use IMT in treating patients with Exercise-Induced Laryngeal Obstruction (EILO), we need better insight into the dynamics of pressure transmission within the upper airways during a MIP manoeuvre. <bold>Aims:</bold> To address feasibility of measuring pressures in the trachea during MIP manoeuvres, and to investigate the pressure transmission within the upper airways in healthy volunteers. <bold>Methods:</bold> Ten healthy volunteers were included in this cross-sectional study. Pressure was measured: 1) by the mouthpiece (PowerBreath KHP②), 2) above the larynx (epiglottis) and 3) in the trachea (pressure transducers positioned via trans-nasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy). The participants performed 3-10 MIP manoeuvres until they reached their peak MIP. <bold>Results:</bold> Ten adults (6 females), aged 23-65 years performed in total 48 MIP manoeuvres. Findings presented in Table 1. <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA4142/T1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>t1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td>Sensor position</td><td>Mean cm H<sub>2</sub>O ± SD</td><td>Minimum MIP cm H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td>Maximum MIP cm H<sub>2</sub>O</td></tr><tr><td>Mouthpiece</td><td>−81.76 ± 25.6</td><td>−30.31</td><td>−137.6</td></tr><tr><td>Epiglottis</td><td>−85.41 ± 25.6</td><td>−37.72</td><td>−140.9</td></tr><tr><td>Trachea</td><td>−86.05 ± 24.3</td><td>−39.66</td><td>−139.4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> Table 1: Maximal inspiratory pressures (MIP), measured at the mouthpiece, epiglottis, and trachea. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> Measuuring tracheal pressure during MIP is possible. Mean pressures were more negative in the trachea than at the mouthpiece, with high standard deviations. The large variability needs to be addressed in future studies, as this may be related to variable laryngeal responses.

Oslo University Hospital (NO), Haukeland University Hospital (NO), Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.