Clinical Response Rate to Endobroncial valve treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; A retrospective cohort study

<bold>Background:</bold> Endobronchial valve (EBV) treatment stands as a viable option for managing emphysema. Despite randomized controlled trials, not all treated patients experience an improvement of symptoms or lung function. This study aims to assess the proportion of EBV-treated patients, who experience an improvement exceeding the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for lung function and exercise capacity. <bold>Method:</bold> This retrospective cohort study includes patients treated with EBV between 2017-2023 at Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark. Information from baseline and three months were retrieved from the medical records. MCIDs chosen from literature search were: FEV1 +12 %, RV -7.5 %, MRC -1 and 6MWD +26 m. <bold>Results:</bold> Among 109 included patients, 80 attended the 3-month visit. Mean age was 64.4 years (±7.62), BMI 24 (± 4.34) and 54% were male. Increase in FEV1% (3.3 %pt., p=0.054), RV reduction(30.9 %pt., p=0.0001), MRC improvement(0.51 , p=0.0046) and 6MWT distance increase (27.3 m, p=0.2789) were observed. Response rate were: FEV1% 37%, RV 65%, MRC 46% and 6MWT 41.5%. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Though, the results showed inconsistent benefit of EBV treatment regarding FEV1, RV, MRC and 6MWD, approximately 1-2 out of 3 patients experienced positive treatment response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa4351
Primary Topic
Voice and Speech Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Response Rate to Endobroncial valve treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; A retrospective cohort study

Morten Bendixen, Elisabeth Bendstrup, Kathrine Bock, Jesper Rømhild Davidsen et al.
1 links
Voice and Speech Disorders
article

Clinical Response Rate to Endobroncial valve treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; A retrospective cohort study

Morten Bendixen, Elisabeth Bendstrup, Kathrine Bock, Jesper Rømhild Davidsen, Ole Dan Jørgensen, Michael Perch, Thomas Decker Christensen, Ingrid Louise Titlestad, Kirstine Hermann Jørgensen, Kristine Jensen
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Endobronchial valve (EBV) treatment stands as a viable option for managing emphysema. Despite randomized controlled trials, not all treated patients experience an improvement of symptoms or lung function. This study aims to assess the proportion of EBV-treated patients, who experience an improvement exceeding the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for lung function and exercise capacity. <bold>Method:</bold> This retrospective cohort study includes patients treated with EBV between 2017-2023 at Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark. Information from baseline and three months were retrieved from the medical records. MCIDs chosen from literature search were: FEV1 +12 %, RV -7.5 %, MRC -1 and 6MWD +26 m. <bold>Results:</bold> Among 109 included patients, 80 attended the 3-month visit. Mean age was 64.4 years (±7.62), BMI 24 (± 4.34) and 54% were male. Increase in FEV1% (3.3 %pt., p=0.054), RV reduction(30.9 %pt., p=0.0001), MRC improvement(0.51 , p=0.0046) and 6MWT distance increase (27.3 m, p=0.2789) were observed. Response rate were: FEV1% 37%, RV 65%, MRC 46% and 6MWT 41.5%. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Though, the results showed inconsistent benefit of EBV treatment regarding FEV1, RV, MRC and 6MWD, approximately 1-2 out of 3 patients experienced positive treatment response.

Odense University Hospital (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Voice and Speech Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.