Assessing the potential of using ChatGPT by patients with asthma

<bold>Background:</bold> ChatGPT – a free artificial intelligence-based natural language processing tool that could be easily used by patients with asthma. <bold>Objective:</bold> To assess the accuracy, comprehensiveness, accessibility and safety of ChatGPT responses to questions about asthma. <bold>Methods:</bold> There were 32 questions chosen from the FAQ about asthma highlighted by the GINA. Questions were presented to the ChatGPT (version 3.5) via smartphone and personal computer (PC) after translating into Ukrainian. Seven experts in respiratory medicine (MDs and PhDs) were invited to analyze answers by 5 criteria (Likert scale of 0-5): completeness of the answer; accuracy of the information; accuracy of using medical terminology; accessibility of information and safety for the patient. The content validity ratio (CVR) was analyzed to examine the consensus among experts. <bold>Results:</bold> The average score for answers received from a PC was 4.3 and 4.1 for smartphone. Score of 4.0 and higher was got 23 answers (71.9%) via smartphone and 26 (81.3%) from PC. Answers from PC showed better results compared to those from smartphone based on accuracy of the information (4.1 vs 4.0), accuracy of medical terminology (4.2 vs 4.1), comprehensiveness (4.1 vs 3.3, p<0.001), safety (4.5 vs 4.0), but worse for accessibility (4.4 vs 4.5). The best consensus among experts received 2 answers from a PC and 2 from a smartphone according to CVR of 0.99 or higher (answers about the causes, triggers of asthma and prognosis). <bold>Conclusions:</bold> ChatGPT answers about asthma via smartphone and PC show positive scores for all criteria of analysis and PC answers have better results without comprehensive statistical differences. CVR analysis determines only 4 answers as valid.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa4377
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the potential of using ChatGPT by patients with asthma

Vitalii Poberezhets, Oksana Viltsaniuk, Nataliia Slepchenko, Tetyana Konstantynovych et al.
1 citations
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.12
article

Assessing the potential of using ChatGPT by patients with asthma

Vitalii Poberezhets, Oksana Viltsaniuk, Nataliia Slepchenko, Tetyana Konstantynovych, Mariia Ovcharuk, Anna Demchuk, Vladyslav Kernitskyi, Alina Dovhan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> ChatGPT – a free artificial intelligence-based natural language processing tool that could be easily used by patients with asthma. <bold>Objective:</bold> To assess the accuracy, comprehensiveness, accessibility and safety of ChatGPT responses to questions about asthma. <bold>Methods:</bold> There were 32 questions chosen from the FAQ about asthma highlighted by the GINA. Questions were presented to the ChatGPT (version 3.5) via smartphone and personal computer (PC) after translating into Ukrainian. Seven experts in respiratory medicine (MDs and PhDs) were invited to analyze answers by 5 criteria (Likert scale of 0-5): completeness of the answer; accuracy of the information; accuracy of using medical terminology; accessibility of information and safety for the patient. The content validity ratio (CVR) was analyzed to examine the consensus among experts. <bold>Results:</bold> The average score for answers received from a PC was 4.3 and 4.1 for smartphone. Score of 4.0 and higher was got 23 answers (71.9%) via smartphone and 26 (81.3%) from PC. Answers from PC showed better results compared to those from smartphone based on accuracy of the information (4.1 vs 4.0), accuracy of medical terminology (4.2 vs 4.1), comprehensiveness (4.1 vs 3.3, p<0.001), safety (4.5 vs 4.0), but worse for accessibility (4.4 vs 4.5). The best consensus among experts received 2 answers from a PC and 2 from a smartphone according to CVR of 0.99 or higher (answers about the causes, triggers of asthma and prognosis). <bold>Conclusions:</bold> ChatGPT answers about asthma via smartphone and PC show positive scores for all criteria of analysis and PC answers have better results without comprehensive statistical differences. CVR analysis determines only 4 answers as valid.

National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.