Granulomatous inflammation in EBUS-FNA negatively predicts malignant nodal involvement in patients with co-existing past or present malignancy.

<bold>Background:</bold> Granulomatous inflammation in EBUS FNA in the background of thoracic and extrathoracic malignancy poses challenges in interpretation <bold>Aims & Objectives:</bold> To determine the significance of finding granulomatous inflammation in EBUS-FNA in the background of previous or active malignancy. <bold>Methods:</bold> Retrospective analysis of 3059 EBUS-TBNA cases from 2011-2018. <bold>Results:</bold> Of 142 (4.64%) samples which showed granulomatous inflammation, 32 (22.5%) cases were associated with malignancy. Imaging was available in 17 cases. Of these 17 cases, PET was done in 7 cases. All except one case showed indeterminate to low uptake. The exceptional case showed mediastinal nodes with an SUV max of 10.1, with associated radiological features of sarcoidosis. The mean nodal size was 15mm. The most frequent nodal stations were station 7 (73.9%), and station 4R (50.7%). Breast carcinomas (n=5), carcinoid tumours (n=4, 3- rectum, 1- lung), colorectal adenocarcinomas (n=4), melanoma (n=4) and primary lung adenocarcinoma (n=3) were some of the associated malignancies. One case showed both malignancy (Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, CLL) and granulomatous inflammation in the same node. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Granulomatous inflammation in the nodal-FNA excluded the presence of metastasis of the primary malignancy in all but one case of CLL indicating a high negative predictive value in excluding metastases of the primary malignancy. However, further studies/systematic review is warranted to validate these findings given small sample size.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa4761
Primary Topic
Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Granulomatous inflammation in EBUS-FNA negatively predicts malignant nodal involvement in patients with co-existing past or present malignancy.

António Paiva‐Correia, Ishitha Gunadala
Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Granulomatous inflammation in EBUS-FNA negatively predicts malignant nodal involvement in patients with co-existing past or present malignancy.

António Paiva‐Correia, Ishitha Gunadala
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Granulomatous inflammation in EBUS FNA in the background of thoracic and extrathoracic malignancy poses challenges in interpretation <bold>Aims & Objectives:</bold> To determine the significance of finding granulomatous inflammation in EBUS-FNA in the background of previous or active malignancy. <bold>Methods:</bold> Retrospective analysis of 3059 EBUS-TBNA cases from 2011-2018. <bold>Results:</bold> Of 142 (4.64%) samples which showed granulomatous inflammation, 32 (22.5%) cases were associated with malignancy. Imaging was available in 17 cases. Of these 17 cases, PET was done in 7 cases. All except one case showed indeterminate to low uptake. The exceptional case showed mediastinal nodes with an SUV max of 10.1, with associated radiological features of sarcoidosis. The mean nodal size was 15mm. The most frequent nodal stations were station 7 (73.9%), and station 4R (50.7%). Breast carcinomas (n=5), carcinoid tumours (n=4, 3- rectum, 1- lung), colorectal adenocarcinomas (n=4), melanoma (n=4) and primary lung adenocarcinoma (n=3) were some of the associated malignancies. One case showed both malignancy (Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, CLL) and granulomatous inflammation in the same node. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Granulomatous inflammation in the nodal-FNA excluded the presence of metastasis of the primary malignancy in all but one case of CLL indicating a high negative predictive value in excluding metastases of the primary malignancy. However, further studies/systematic review is warranted to validate these findings given small sample size.

Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.