Hydrogen peroxide as a potential marker for monitoring airway inflammation in severe asthma patients on biologics

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Monitoring biologic treatment response in severe asthmatics requires objective biomarkers, given limitations in assessing optimal control based mainly on symptoms and lung function. In this respect, we investigated a potential marker of airway inflammation, hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), measured by exhaled breath condensate (EBC). <bold>Materials and Methods</bold>: In this monocenter, prospective study, we assessed exhaled H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> levels in severe asthmatics on biologics and healthy controls with Inflammacheck® by Exhalation Technology. H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> fluctuations in asthmatics were explored over two weeks. Symptoms were defined as high vs. low-controlled based on asthma control questionnaires ACT and ACQ6. Low-control was defined as ACT≤19 and/or ACQ6≥1 and high-control: ACT>19 and/or ACQ6<1. WhitneyU test (p≤0.05) was used to compare H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> of high-controlled severe asthmatics and healthy controls. <bold>Results:</bold> In 16 severe asthmatics, there were no significant exhaled-H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> differences at baseline and after two weeks. Low-controlled patients (n=5) had elevated H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (median[IQR]: 0.96[0.8-1.4]μM) vs high-controlled (n=11; median[IQR]: 0.5[0.1-0.6]μM) (p=0.002). These latter, exhibited slightly higher H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> concentrations than healthy controls (n=16; median[IQR]: 0.4[0.1-0.6]) (p=0.05; p=0.01. Based on ACT, ACQ6, respectively). <bold>Conclusions:</bold> These preliminary findings suggest that H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> is associated with symptoms’ control in severe asthma patients on biologics, hinting at its potential as a stable, objective marker for severe asthma disease monitoring. Subsequent analyses will aim to confirm H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> utility in enhancing disease management for severe asthma patients on biologics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa4811
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydrogen peroxide as a potential marker for monitoring airway inflammation in severe asthma patients on biologics

Claudia Gagliani, Stefania Principe, Anke-H. Maitland Van Der Zee, Maria L. Urso et al.
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

Hydrogen peroxide as a potential marker for monitoring airway inflammation in severe asthma patients on biologics

Claudia Gagliani, Stefania Principe, Anke-H. Maitland Van Der Zee, Maria L. Urso, Paul Brinkman, Alida Benfante, Nicola Scichilone, Alessia Leonarda Lisotta, Dario Bartolo Macaluso, Elisa Epifani
article en

Abstract

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Monitoring biologic treatment response in severe asthmatics requires objective biomarkers, given limitations in assessing optimal control based mainly on symptoms and lung function. In this respect, we investigated a potential marker of airway inflammation, hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), measured by exhaled breath condensate (EBC). <bold>Materials and Methods</bold>: In this monocenter, prospective study, we assessed exhaled H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> levels in severe asthmatics on biologics and healthy controls with Inflammacheck® by Exhalation Technology. H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> fluctuations in asthmatics were explored over two weeks. Symptoms were defined as high vs. low-controlled based on asthma control questionnaires ACT and ACQ6. Low-control was defined as ACT≤19 and/or ACQ6≥1 and high-control: ACT>19 and/or ACQ6<1. WhitneyU test (p≤0.05) was used to compare H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> of high-controlled severe asthmatics and healthy controls. <bold>Results:</bold> In 16 severe asthmatics, there were no significant exhaled-H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> differences at baseline and after two weeks. Low-controlled patients (n=5) had elevated H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (median[IQR]: 0.96[0.8-1.4]μM) vs high-controlled (n=11; median[IQR]: 0.5[0.1-0.6]μM) (p=0.002). These latter, exhibited slightly higher H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> concentrations than healthy controls (n=16; median[IQR]: 0.4[0.1-0.6]) (p=0.05; p=0.01. Based on ACT, ACQ6, respectively). <bold>Conclusions:</bold> These preliminary findings suggest that H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> is associated with symptoms’ control in severe asthma patients on biologics, hinting at its potential as a stable, objective marker for severe asthma disease monitoring. Subsequent analyses will aim to confirm H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> utility in enhancing disease management for severe asthma patients on biologics.

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo (IT), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.