Domiciliary nasal high flow therapy for breathlessness; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

<bold>Introduction/Aim:</bold> Nasal high flow therapy (NHF) is an established treatment for acute respiratory failure, however data regarding benefits of domiciliary NHF in people with COPD are limited. This phase II trial aimed to determine feasibility and acceptability of NHF for people with COPD and severe breathlessness. <bold>Methods:</bold> A single-arm, open label, mixed methods, phase II trial of an 8-day, air-only NHF intervention in adult patients with COPD and severe breathlessness not requiring domiciliary oxygen therapy. <bold>Results:</bold> 15 participants were enrolled (mean age 73.6; 40% women; mean FEV1 41% predicted; mean DLco 43% predicted; mean mMRC 3.7). 87% completed the trial with 54% keeping the device, 20% reported continued use at 8 months post-trial. Adherence varied, with average daily usage higher amongst participants who kept the device compared to those who returned it (6.8±2.3h vs 3.4±3.7h). No significant changes in mean difference at day 8 relative to baseline were detected for worst breathlessness (0.7±1.2 (mean±SD), p=0.109), dyspnoea mastery (0.3±0.6, p=0.176) or fatigue (0.0±2.4, p=1.00). No significant adverse events were reported. Qualitative interviews demonstrated subjective improvements in breathlessness, dry mouth, and sputum production for some, whilst others found NHF uncomfortable. Fear of NHF dependence and concerns regarding long-term running costs were reported. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> Domiciliary NHF was a feasible intervention, with varied adoption and acceptability. Trial implementation outcomes may have affected preliminary effectiveness outcomes. Further research is required to determine what role domiciliary NHF may have for people with COPD and severe breathlessness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa4762
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Domiciliary nasal high flow therapy for breathlessness; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

David C. Currow, Natasha Smallwood, Amy Pascoe, Brian Le et al.
1 links
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Domiciliary nasal high flow therapy for breathlessness; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

David C. Currow, Natasha Smallwood, Amy Pascoe, Brian Le, Aaron Wong, Catherine Buchan
article en

Abstract

<bold>Introduction/Aim:</bold> Nasal high flow therapy (NHF) is an established treatment for acute respiratory failure, however data regarding benefits of domiciliary NHF in people with COPD are limited. This phase II trial aimed to determine feasibility and acceptability of NHF for people with COPD and severe breathlessness. <bold>Methods:</bold> A single-arm, open label, mixed methods, phase II trial of an 8-day, air-only NHF intervention in adult patients with COPD and severe breathlessness not requiring domiciliary oxygen therapy. <bold>Results:</bold> 15 participants were enrolled (mean age 73.6; 40% women; mean FEV1 41% predicted; mean DLco 43% predicted; mean mMRC 3.7). 87% completed the trial with 54% keeping the device, 20% reported continued use at 8 months post-trial. Adherence varied, with average daily usage higher amongst participants who kept the device compared to those who returned it (6.8±2.3h vs 3.4±3.7h). No significant changes in mean difference at day 8 relative to baseline were detected for worst breathlessness (0.7±1.2 (mean±SD), p=0.109), dyspnoea mastery (0.3±0.6, p=0.176) or fatigue (0.0±2.4, p=1.00). No significant adverse events were reported. Qualitative interviews demonstrated subjective improvements in breathlessness, dry mouth, and sputum production for some, whilst others found NHF uncomfortable. Fear of NHF dependence and concerns regarding long-term running costs were reported. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> Domiciliary NHF was a feasible intervention, with varied adoption and acceptability. Trial implementation outcomes may have affected preliminary effectiveness outcomes. Further research is required to determine what role domiciliary NHF may have for people with COPD and severe breathlessness.

The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), University of Wollongong (AU), The Alfred Hospital (AU), Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre (AU), Monash University (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.