Longitudinal changes of diffusing capacity (DLCO) and dyspnoea after mild COVID-19

<italic><bold>Background:</bold></italic> Post-Covid-Syndrome (PCS) can be quantified by the PCS severity score (PCSS, Bahmer T et al, eClinicalMedicine, 2022). It is based on 12 self-reported symptom complexes, including subjective dyspnoea, which may result from impaired diffusing capacity of the lung (DLCO). <italic><bold>Objective:</bold></italic> We aimed to quantify longitudinal DLCO changes in patients after mild COVID-19 based on PCS severity (PCSS<sub>hi</sub> vs. PCSS<sub>lo</sub>). <italic><bold>Methods</bold><bold>:</bold></italic> COVIDOM is a prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals, recruited ≥6 months after PCR confirmation with <10% hospitalization rate in total. Follow-Ups (FUs) were scheduled 12-18 months after PCR testing. Dyspnoea was assessed using a standardized questionnaire (MDP-A1), DLCO was measured according to ERS criteria. <italic><bold>Results:</bold></italic> 2,993 participants had complete lung function data at baseline (BL) with a mean DLCO of 95.15 %pred (z-score −0.37); 8.5% of these showed relevant impairments (DLCO<LLN, GLI 2012). In PCSS<sub>hi</sub> vs. PCSS<sub>lo</sub> mean DLCO z-scores were −0.42±0.99 vs. −0.34±0.95 at BL and −0.54±0.95 vs. −0.38±1.00 at FU (all p>0.05). Median MDP-A1 differed significantly between both groups at BL (3 [IQR 1-5] vs. 0 [2-0]) and FU (2 [0-4] vs. 0 [1-0]) (all p<0.001). DLCO z-scores slightly worsened over time in both groups (p<0.05), while MDP-A1 scores improved in PCSS<sub>hi</sub> patients (p<0.05). <italic><bold>Conclusion:</bold></italic> In patients with mild acute COVID-19, marginal DLCO impairments did not differ between PCSS<sub>hi</sub> and PCSS<sub>lo</sub> at BL and FU. In contrast, PCSS<sub>hi</sub> patients had suffered more often from dyspnoea at BL, which markedly improved at FU, indicating that DLCO is not the appropriate measure to quantify breathlessness in PCS patients as reasons other than gas exchange impairment appear more relevant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa5260
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal changes of diffusing capacity (DLCO) and dyspnoea after mild COVID-19

Thomas Bahmer, Thomas Zöller, Carolin Nürnberger, Wolfgang Lieb et al.
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
article

Longitudinal changes of diffusing capacity (DLCO) and dyspnoea after mild COVID-19

Thomas Bahmer, Thomas Zöller, Carolin Nürnberger, Wolfgang Lieb, Peter U. Heuschmann, Klaus F. Rabe, Anne-Kathrin Ruß, Jörg Janne Vehreschild, Eva Heim, Jan Heyckendorf, Michael Krawczak, Sina M. Hopff, Lennart Reinke, Kelley Stanko, Mustafa Abdo, Stefan Störk, Fridolin Steinbeis, Henrik Watz, Katrin Franzpötter, Susanne Poick, Stefan Schreiber, Tamina Nichici, Helen Beuter
article en

Abstract

<italic><bold>Background:</bold></italic> Post-Covid-Syndrome (PCS) can be quantified by the PCS severity score (PCSS, Bahmer T et al, eClinicalMedicine, 2022). It is based on 12 self-reported symptom complexes, including subjective dyspnoea, which may result from impaired diffusing capacity of the lung (DLCO). <italic><bold>Objective:</bold></italic> We aimed to quantify longitudinal DLCO changes in patients after mild COVID-19 based on PCS severity (PCSS<sub>hi</sub> vs. PCSS<sub>lo</sub>). <italic><bold>Methods</bold><bold>:</bold></italic> COVIDOM is a prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals, recruited ≥6 months after PCR confirmation with <10% hospitalization rate in total. Follow-Ups (FUs) were scheduled 12-18 months after PCR testing. Dyspnoea was assessed using a standardized questionnaire (MDP-A1), DLCO was measured according to ERS criteria. <italic><bold>Results:</bold></italic> 2,993 participants had complete lung function data at baseline (BL) with a mean DLCO of 95.15 %pred (z-score −0.37); 8.5% of these showed relevant impairments (DLCO<LLN, GLI 2012). In PCSS<sub>hi</sub> vs. PCSS<sub>lo</sub> mean DLCO z-scores were −0.42±0.99 vs. −0.34±0.95 at BL and −0.54±0.95 vs. −0.38±1.00 at FU (all p>0.05). Median MDP-A1 differed significantly between both groups at BL (3 [IQR 1-5] vs. 0 [2-0]) and FU (2 [0-4] vs. 0 [1-0]) (all p<0.001). DLCO z-scores slightly worsened over time in both groups (p<0.05), while MDP-A1 scores improved in PCSS<sub>hi</sub> patients (p<0.05). <italic><bold>Conclusion:</bold></italic> In patients with mild acute COVID-19, marginal DLCO impairments did not differ between PCSS<sub>hi</sub> and PCSS<sub>lo</sub> at BL and FU. In contrast, PCSS<sub>hi</sub> patients had suffered more often from dyspnoea at BL, which markedly improved at FU, indicating that DLCO is not the appropriate measure to quantify breathlessness in PCS patients as reasons other than gas exchange impairment appear more relevant.

Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), University of Würzburg (DE), Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Kiel (DE), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), German Center for Lung Research (DE), University Hospital Cologne (DE), Clinical Research Center Kiel (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), University of Lübeck (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.