Acceptability of remote lung function testing using portable spirometry devices: perspectives of children and young people with respiratory conditions and their caregivers.

<bold>Background:</bold> Portable spirometry devices enable children and young people (CYP) with respiratory conditions to undergo remote lung function assessment. Although previous research indicates the efficacy of portable spirometry devices compared to hospital-based equipment, it is important to explore user perspectives prior to implementation. <bold>Aims:</bold> Understand the acceptability of portable spirometry devices in CYP with respiratory conditions and caregivers. <bold>Methods:</bold> As part of a multicentre prospective cohort study conducted between 2021-22, n=73 CYP performed supervised spirometry (via video link) and unsupervised spirometry using a portable device at home. CYP and caregivers subsequently completed mixed-methods questionnaires assessing the acceptability of portable spirometers. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis, respectively. <bold>Results:</bold> n=60 CYP (n=25 children and n=35 adolescents) aged 5-16 years (mean 12 years), and caregivers, completed the study. 96% of children and 100% of adolescents and caregivers reported a positive experience of portable spirometry. Participants considered the approach reliable and time efficient – with 94% taking <10 mins – and cited societal benefits including reduced travel and school absence. However, challenges included device set-up and CYP lacking motivation to test. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> Findings from this preliminary analysis suggest portable spirometers are considered acceptable, convenient and empower caregivers to monitor lung function to support better self-management. Cost-benefit-analysis remains a research priority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa4936
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptability of remote lung function testing using portable spirometry devices: perspectives of children and young people with respiratory conditions and their caregivers.

Emma Fettes, Oliver J. Price, Heather Elphick, Paul Burns et al.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Acceptability of remote lung function testing using portable spirometry devices: perspectives of children and young people with respiratory conditions and their caregivers.

Emma Fettes, Oliver J. Price, Heather Elphick, Paul Burns, Nicki Barker, Moira Gibbons, Joe Sails, Evie Robson, Louis Stokes
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Portable spirometry devices enable children and young people (CYP) with respiratory conditions to undergo remote lung function assessment. Although previous research indicates the efficacy of portable spirometry devices compared to hospital-based equipment, it is important to explore user perspectives prior to implementation. <bold>Aims:</bold> Understand the acceptability of portable spirometry devices in CYP with respiratory conditions and caregivers. <bold>Methods:</bold> As part of a multicentre prospective cohort study conducted between 2021-22, n=73 CYP performed supervised spirometry (via video link) and unsupervised spirometry using a portable device at home. CYP and caregivers subsequently completed mixed-methods questionnaires assessing the acceptability of portable spirometers. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis, respectively. <bold>Results:</bold> n=60 CYP (n=25 children and n=35 adolescents) aged 5-16 years (mean 12 years), and caregivers, completed the study. 96% of children and 100% of adolescents and caregivers reported a positive experience of portable spirometry. Participants considered the approach reliable and time efficient – with 94% taking <10 mins – and cited societal benefits including reduced travel and school absence. However, challenges included device set-up and CYP lacking motivation to test. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> Findings from this preliminary analysis suggest portable spirometers are considered acceptable, convenient and empower caregivers to monitor lung function to support better self-management. Cost-benefit-analysis remains a research priority.

University of Leeds (GB), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Royal Hospital for Children (GB), Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Leeds Beckett University (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.