Psychometric properties of the 1-sit-to-stand test in pulmonary hypertension

<bold>Background:</bold> The one-minute sit-to-stand test (1-STS) has been used to evaluate patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), however, its psychometric properties are not well established. <bold>Objective:</bold> To assess the 1-STS intra and inter-rater reliability besides validity versus the six-minute walking test (6MWT) in patients with PH. <bold>Methods:</bold> This is a cross-sectional study, with PH patients. All participants performed a 6MWT and two 1-STS, with a half-hour interval between them. Two independent observers measure 1-STS repetitions. Data distribution was assessed by Shapiro-Wilk, reliability through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change at 95% level of confidence (MDC95), and validity by Pearson correlation. <bold>Results:</bold> Twelve women with PH (groups 1 and 4) were included, 43.5±13.0 years and a BMI of 25.3±3.5 kg/m². We found a good intra-rater in 1-STS: 23.0±7.5 and 23.5±8.5 repetitions, ICC [0.92 (95% CI 0.76-0.97)], SEM 2.4 and MDC 6.7 repetitions and in the inter-rater were 23.0±7.5 and 22.8±8.8, ICC [0.93 (95% CI 0.77-0.98)], SEM 2.3, and MDC 6.4 repetitions. We also found a strong correlation between 1-STS and 6MWT (r=0.75, p=0.004). <bold>Conclusions:</bold> The 1-STS proved to be reliable, and valid for assessing functional capacity in patients with PH. Still, just one test is enough to determine your measurement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa5039
Primary Topic
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric properties of the 1-sit-to-stand test in pulmonary hypertension

Ilsa Priscila Santos, Lucas Melo da Costa, Natália Cardoso, Joceline Sá et al.
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
article

Psychometric properties of the 1-sit-to-stand test in pulmonary hypertension

Ilsa Priscila Santos, Lucas Melo da Costa, Natália Cardoso, Joceline Sá, Isabel Blanco, Rodrigo Torres‐Castro, Vanessa Resqueti, Guilherme Fregonezi, A. Fontes
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> The one-minute sit-to-stand test (1-STS) has been used to evaluate patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), however, its psychometric properties are not well established. <bold>Objective:</bold> To assess the 1-STS intra and inter-rater reliability besides validity versus the six-minute walking test (6MWT) in patients with PH. <bold>Methods:</bold> This is a cross-sectional study, with PH patients. All participants performed a 6MWT and two 1-STS, with a half-hour interval between them. Two independent observers measure 1-STS repetitions. Data distribution was assessed by Shapiro-Wilk, reliability through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change at 95% level of confidence (MDC95), and validity by Pearson correlation. <bold>Results:</bold> Twelve women with PH (groups 1 and 4) were included, 43.5±13.0 years and a BMI of 25.3±3.5 kg/m². We found a good intra-rater in 1-STS: 23.0±7.5 and 23.5±8.5 repetitions, ICC [0.92 (95% CI 0.76-0.97)], SEM 2.4 and MDC 6.7 repetitions and in the inter-rater were 23.0±7.5 and 22.8±8.8, ICC [0.93 (95% CI 0.77-0.98)], SEM 2.3, and MDC 6.4 repetitions. We also found a strong correlation between 1-STS and 6MWT (r=0.75, p=0.004). <bold>Conclusions:</bold> The 1-STS proved to be reliable, and valid for assessing functional capacity in patients with PH. Still, just one test is enough to determine your measurement.

Universidad de Santiago de Chile (CL), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR), Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes (BR), Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES), Medical Research Network (US), University of Chile (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.