Frailty in adults hospitalised due to acute exacerbation of chronic lung disease: a comparison of assessment methods.

<bold>Background:</bold> Frailty is detectable and common (up to 40%) in people with acute exacerbations of COPD, however is not routinely assessed in clinical practice, particularly in chronic lung diseases other than COPD. Various tools exist to evaluate frailty, each possessing pros and cons. We sought to compare the performance of two different frailty assessment methods across a variety of conditions to explore their impact. <bold>Methods:</bold> Data were prospectively collected from sequential patients admitted to a major public hospital network in Melbourne, Australia between March to July 2021. Patients must have had a primary diagnosis of asthma, bronchiectasis, COPD, ILD, lung cancer or pneumonia. Frailty was assessed via Fried phenotype and FRAIL Scale during their inpatient admission (both tools) and 1-month later via telephone (FRAIL Scale). The relationship between raw tool scores was compared via Pearson's r correlation coefficient; prevalence of frailty status was compared descriptively and visually. <bold>Results:</bold> 77 participants were recruited (46 female; mean 62 years; FEV<sub>1</sub> 71% pred; BMI 29.7). Frailty was detectable in similar proportions using Fried or FRAIL (overall 41.6% vs 51.9%; described further in Table). Scores demonstrated moderate correlation (r=0.55). 15/24 participants were persistently frail from admission to follow-up (FRAIL Scale). <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA5031/T1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>t1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td>% cases</td><td>Asthma (n=11)</td><td>Bronchiectasis (n=4)</td><td>COPD (n=29)</td><td>ILD (n=3)</td><td>Lung cancer (n=3)</td><td>Pneumonia (n=26)</td></tr><tr><td>FRAIL Scale</td><td>15</td><td>7.5</td><td>35</td><td>7.5</td><td>7.5</td><td>27.5</td></tr><tr><td>Fried</td><td>12.5</td><td>6.3</td><td>40.6</td><td>6.3</td><td>6.3</td><td>28.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Frailty is detectable across various conditions during acute respiratory hospitalisation. Consideration should be given to choice of assessment method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa5031
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frailty in adults hospitalised due to acute exacerbation of chronic lung disease: a comparison of assessment methods.

Jessica Lam, Christian Osadnik, Weiwei Deng, Carla Gordon et al.
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Frailty in adults hospitalised due to acute exacerbation of chronic lung disease: a comparison of assessment methods.

Jessica Lam, Christian Osadnik, Weiwei Deng, Carla Gordon, Jiyoon Jung, Jared Chan
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Frailty is detectable and common (up to 40%) in people with acute exacerbations of COPD, however is not routinely assessed in clinical practice, particularly in chronic lung diseases other than COPD. Various tools exist to evaluate frailty, each possessing pros and cons. We sought to compare the performance of two different frailty assessment methods across a variety of conditions to explore their impact. <bold>Methods:</bold> Data were prospectively collected from sequential patients admitted to a major public hospital network in Melbourne, Australia between March to July 2021. Patients must have had a primary diagnosis of asthma, bronchiectasis, COPD, ILD, lung cancer or pneumonia. Frailty was assessed via Fried phenotype and FRAIL Scale during their inpatient admission (both tools) and 1-month later via telephone (FRAIL Scale). The relationship between raw tool scores was compared via Pearson's r correlation coefficient; prevalence of frailty status was compared descriptively and visually. <bold>Results:</bold> 77 participants were recruited (46 female; mean 62 years; FEV<sub>1</sub> 71% pred; BMI 29.7). Frailty was detectable in similar proportions using Fried or FRAIL (overall 41.6% vs 51.9%; described further in Table). Scores demonstrated moderate correlation (r=0.55). 15/24 participants were persistently frail from admission to follow-up (FRAIL Scale). <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA5031/T1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>t1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td>% cases</td><td>Asthma (n=11)</td><td>Bronchiectasis (n=4)</td><td>COPD (n=29)</td><td>ILD (n=3)</td><td>Lung cancer (n=3)</td><td>Pneumonia (n=26)</td></tr><tr><td>FRAIL Scale</td><td>15</td><td>7.5</td><td>35</td><td>7.5</td><td>7.5</td><td>27.5</td></tr><tr><td>Fried</td><td>12.5</td><td>6.3</td><td>40.6</td><td>6.3</td><td>6.3</td><td>28.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Frailty is detectable across various conditions during acute respiratory hospitalisation. Consideration should be given to choice of assessment method.

Monash Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.