Enhanced production of 60Fe in massive stars

Massive stars are a major source of chemical elements in the cosmos, ejecting freshly produced nuclei through winds and core-collapse supernova explosions into the interstellar medium. Among the material ejected, long-lived radioisotopes, such as <sup>60</sup>Fe (iron) and <sup>26</sup>Al (aluminum), offer unique signs of active nucleosynthesis in our galaxy. There is a long-standing discrepancy between the observed <sup>60</sup>Fe/<sup>26</sup>Al ratio by γ-ray telescopes and predictions from supernova models. This discrepancy has been attributed to uncertainties in the nuclear reaction networks producing <sup>60</sup>Fe, and one reaction in particular, the neutron-capture on <sup>59</sup>Fe. Here we present experimental results that provide a strong constraint on this reaction. We use these results to show that the production of <sup>60</sup>Fe in massive stars is higher than previously thought, further increasing the discrepancy between observed and predicted <sup>60</sup>Fe/<sup>26</sup>Al ratios. The persisting discrepancy can therefore not be attributed to nuclear uncertainties, and points to issues in massive-star models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54040-4
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Nuclear physics research studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced production of 60Fe in massive stars

A. C. Larsen, A. C. Dombos, G. Perdikakis, C. J. Prokop et al.
6 citations
Nature Communications
Nuclear physics research studies
3.96
article

Enhanced production of 60Fe in massive stars

A. C. Larsen, A. C. Dombos, G. Perdikakis, C. J. Prokop, K. Hermansen, H. Schatz, C. Sumithrarachchi, A. Spyrou, S. Lyons, A. Palmisano-Kyle, Douglas D. Richman, A. Couture, B. P. Crider, M. Guttormsen, S. N. Liddick, P. Gastis, J. E. Midtbø, K. Childers, P. A. DeYoung, Carl Fields, A. Sweet, S. Mosby, D. Muecher, M. K. Smith, R. Lewis, F. Naqvi
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Massive stars are a major source of chemical elements in the cosmos, ejecting freshly produced nuclei through winds and core-collapse supernova explosions into the interstellar medium. Among the material ejected, long-lived radioisotopes, such as <sup>60</sup>Fe (iron) and <sup>26</sup>Al (aluminum), offer unique signs of active nucleosynthesis in our galaxy. There is a long-standing discrepancy between the observed <sup>60</sup>Fe/<sup>26</sup>Al ratio by γ-ray telescopes and predictions from supernova models. This discrepancy has been attributed to uncertainties in the nuclear reaction networks producing <sup>60</sup>Fe, and one reaction in particular, the neutron-capture on <sup>59</sup>Fe. Here we present experimental results that provide a strong constraint on this reaction. We use these results to show that the production of <sup>60</sup>Fe in massive stars is higher than previously thought, further increasing the discrepancy between observed and predicted <sup>60</sup>Fe/<sup>26</sup>Al ratios. The persisting discrepancy can therefore not be attributed to nuclear uncertainties, and points to issues in massive-star models.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 15(1)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US), Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), University of Arizona (US), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Hope College (US), Central Michigan University (US), University of Cologne (DE), University of Oslo (NO), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), Michigan State University (US), Texas A&M University (US), Mississippi State University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of State, Battelle, Michigan State University, Fulbright Norway, Norges Forskningsråd, Office of Science, National Nuclear Security Administration, College of Engineering, Michigan State University, Nuclear Physics, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Nuclear physics research studies
3.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.