Rifapentine + isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection in Brazil: a retrospective cohort study

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) is a public health challenge due to its duration and adverse events (AE) that lead to therapy cessation. In 2021, Brazil recommended isoniazid (H) + rifapentine (P) to treat LTBI aiming to reduce AE and increase adherence. <bold>Objectives:</bold> Our goal was to describe patients treated for LTBI in a university hospital and compare outcomes according to the regimen. <bold>Methods:</bold> In this single-center study, secondary data were extracted from database of the tuberculosis special treatment information system. A total of 279 patients were notified for LTBI at Pedro Ernesto University Hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil from 2018 to 2023. Statistical analysis used the Chi-square test with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. <bold>Results:</bold> Out of 279 patients, 65.2% were female, with a mean age of 48 years (SD±15). The main indications for LTBI treatment were: use of immunobiological and/or immunosuppressant (83.5%) and HIV infection (5.2%). The prescribed regimens were as follows: H for 73.5% of patients, HP for 17.9%, and Rifampicin (R) for 8.6%. The 247 known outcomes were compared based on the regimens used. Among patients who used H, 20% were lost to follow-up vs. 4.8% R vs. 3.2% HP. In addition, the therapy that resulted in the lowest suspension rate was HP (3.2% vs. 5.6% H vs. 14.3% R). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Group that used HP had a higher rate of therapy completion (93.5% vs. 81% in the R group vs. 74.4% in the H group) with p = 0.03. In this sample, patients receiving the H regimen had higher frequencies of adverse events leading to treatment suspension, while the use of HP was better tolerated and had higher rates of treatment completion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa1468
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rifapentine + isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection in Brazil: a retrospective cohort study

Ana Paula Santos, Walter Costa, Beatriz Caroline Soares Chaves, Janaína Leung et al.
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
article

Rifapentine + isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection in Brazil: a retrospective cohort study

Ana Paula Santos, Walter Costa, Beatriz Caroline Soares Chaves, Janaína Leung, Ana Carolina Souza
article en

Abstract

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) is a public health challenge due to its duration and adverse events (AE) that lead to therapy cessation. In 2021, Brazil recommended isoniazid (H) + rifapentine (P) to treat LTBI aiming to reduce AE and increase adherence. <bold>Objectives:</bold> Our goal was to describe patients treated for LTBI in a university hospital and compare outcomes according to the regimen. <bold>Methods:</bold> In this single-center study, secondary data were extracted from database of the tuberculosis special treatment information system. A total of 279 patients were notified for LTBI at Pedro Ernesto University Hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil from 2018 to 2023. Statistical analysis used the Chi-square test with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. <bold>Results:</bold> Out of 279 patients, 65.2% were female, with a mean age of 48 years (SD±15). The main indications for LTBI treatment were: use of immunobiological and/or immunosuppressant (83.5%) and HIV infection (5.2%). The prescribed regimens were as follows: H for 73.5% of patients, HP for 17.9%, and Rifampicin (R) for 8.6%. The 247 known outcomes were compared based on the regimens used. Among patients who used H, 20% were lost to follow-up vs. 4.8% R vs. 3.2% HP. In addition, the therapy that resulted in the lowest suspension rate was HP (3.2% vs. 5.6% H vs. 14.3% R). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Group that used HP had a higher rate of therapy completion (93.5% vs. 81% in the R group vs. 74.4% in the H group) with p = 0.03. In this sample, patients receiving the H regimen had higher frequencies of adverse events leading to treatment suspension, while the use of HP was better tolerated and had higher rates of treatment completion.

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.