Understanding what drives Genetic Study Participation: Perspectives of Patients, Carers, and Relatives

<bold>Background:</bold> This study examined attitudes towards genetic research among patients, caregivers, and relatives and gathered feedback for enhancing genetic study delivery and smooth integration of genetics into clinical practice. <bold>Methods:</bold> Using purposive sampling, 63 stakeholders from the NBR and PAH Cohort studies were recruited to take part in semi-structured interviews and focus groups, which were analysed thematically. <bold>Results:</bold> Key interview themes revealed insights into PAH genetic research participation, encompassing attitudes toward genetic research, understanding of study aims, disease knowledge, motivations and barriers, awareness of consent procedures, interest in data use, and communication of genetic results and their familial impact. Genetic research participation is influenced by altruism, personal experiences with diagnostic journeys and trust in healthcare teams, concerns and hopes for family members, and a sense of community belonging. Time, financial constraints, and burdensome study procedures are commonly cited reasons for non-participation; hardly any patients shared identical sets of attitudes, emphasising the need for personalised approaches to recruitment. Many patients had limited engagement with study materials, including consent forms. Those receiving individual genetic results were satisfied, while those without feedback were disappointed. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> Increasing genetic research participation and enhancing its integration into clinical practice requires adapting engagement strategies, clear communication, and support from healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa1617
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding what drives Genetic Study Participation: Perspectives of Patients, Carers, and Relatives

Michaela Fay, Emilia Maria ŚWIETLIK, Nicholas W. Morrell
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Understanding what drives Genetic Study Participation: Perspectives of Patients, Carers, and Relatives

Michaela Fay, Emilia Maria ŚWIETLIK, Nicholas W. Morrell
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> This study examined attitudes towards genetic research among patients, caregivers, and relatives and gathered feedback for enhancing genetic study delivery and smooth integration of genetics into clinical practice. <bold>Methods:</bold> Using purposive sampling, 63 stakeholders from the NBR and PAH Cohort studies were recruited to take part in semi-structured interviews and focus groups, which were analysed thematically. <bold>Results:</bold> Key interview themes revealed insights into PAH genetic research participation, encompassing attitudes toward genetic research, understanding of study aims, disease knowledge, motivations and barriers, awareness of consent procedures, interest in data use, and communication of genetic results and their familial impact. Genetic research participation is influenced by altruism, personal experiences with diagnostic journeys and trust in healthcare teams, concerns and hopes for family members, and a sense of community belonging. Time, financial constraints, and burdensome study procedures are commonly cited reasons for non-participation; hardly any patients shared identical sets of attitudes, emphasising the need for personalised approaches to recruitment. Many patients had limited engagement with study materials, including consent forms. Those receiving individual genetic results were satisfied, while those without feedback were disappointed. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> Increasing genetic research participation and enhancing its integration into clinical practice requires adapting engagement strategies, clear communication, and support from healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers.

University of Cambridge (GB), Bridge University (SS), 21c Consultancy (United Kingdom) (GB)
Medical Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.