Investigation of methods to identify the etiology of infection rapidly and accurately by using the Biofire® Film Array® Pneumonia Panel (PN panel) in admitting pneumonia.

<bold>Background:</bold> Accurate identification of pathogens in pneumonia treatment leads to appropriate antimicrobial therapy and prevents unnecessary antimicrobial prescriptions and the development of drug resistance. However, standard methods take a long time to report results. Therefore, antimicrobial selection had to be based on clinical presentation, other risk factors, and experience. Material and methods: We collected sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) from patients admitted with pneumonia who suffering from respiratory disease. We used the Biofire® Film Array® Pneumonia Panel panel (PN panel) and routine bacterial culture for identification organisms caused pneumonia. <bold>Results:</bold> Of 67 patients were enrolled. A total of 67 specimens was included in our study. The PN panel detected 13 bacteria and 2 antimicrobial resistance markers. The PN panel detected <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> and detected mec A/C and MREJ genes most frequently. In virus, the PN panel detected <italic>Human Rhino/ Enterovirus</italic> most frequently. Meanwhile, routine bacterial culture detected <italic>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (MRSA) most frequently. The perfectly concordance between the PN panel and routine bacterial culture was 46.3% The overall positive percent between the PN panel and routine culture for MRSA detection were 100.0% Conversely, the PN panel was negative and routine culture was positive organisms contained <italic>mycobacterium.spp</italic> and <italic>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</italic>. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> The PN Panel had the potential to be a rapid and accurate method for identify the infectious etiology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa1503
Primary Topic
Respiratory viral infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of methods to identify the etiology of infection rapidly and accurately by using the Biofire® Film Array® Pneumonia Panel (PN panel) in admitting pneumonia.

Kentaro Ueno, Riki Uenishi, Hiroaki Kubo, Takahiro Ueda et al.
Respiratory viral infections research
article

Investigation of methods to identify the etiology of infection rapidly and accurately by using the Biofire® Film Array® Pneumonia Panel (PN panel) in admitting pneumonia.

Kentaro Ueno, Riki Uenishi, Hiroaki Kubo, Takahiro Ueda, Hideaki Kadotani, Noriko Takeda, Masaaki Kobayashi, Hidenori Tanaka, Yuri Oshima, Mariko Isii, Haruhiko Matushita
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Accurate identification of pathogens in pneumonia treatment leads to appropriate antimicrobial therapy and prevents unnecessary antimicrobial prescriptions and the development of drug resistance. However, standard methods take a long time to report results. Therefore, antimicrobial selection had to be based on clinical presentation, other risk factors, and experience. Material and methods: We collected sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) from patients admitted with pneumonia who suffering from respiratory disease. We used the Biofire® Film Array® Pneumonia Panel panel (PN panel) and routine bacterial culture for identification organisms caused pneumonia. <bold>Results:</bold> Of 67 patients were enrolled. A total of 67 specimens was included in our study. The PN panel detected 13 bacteria and 2 antimicrobial resistance markers. The PN panel detected <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> and detected mec A/C and MREJ genes most frequently. In virus, the PN panel detected <italic>Human Rhino/ Enterovirus</italic> most frequently. Meanwhile, routine bacterial culture detected <italic>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (MRSA) most frequently. The perfectly concordance between the PN panel and routine bacterial culture was 46.3% The overall positive percent between the PN panel and routine culture for MRSA detection were 100.0% Conversely, the PN panel was negative and routine culture was positive organisms contained <italic>mycobacterium.spp</italic> and <italic>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</italic>. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> The PN Panel had the potential to be a rapid and accurate method for identify the infectious etiology.

Osaka City General Hospital (JP), Izumi City General Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Respiratory viral infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.