Don’t be wed to your classification model: deep learning-based models to diagnose idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using computed tomography

<bold>Background:</bold> Machine learning and deep learning (DL) models have been developed to quantify or classify interstitial lung disease (ILD) patterns on high-resolution CT images (HRCT). A multi-scale guided attention (MSGA) DL was initially developed to distinguish idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) from non-IPF ILD. <bold>Aims:</bold> This study aimed to explore using a MSGA DL model for this classification task and to investigate the implications of using the channel outputs and the attention mechanism from the DL model. <bold>Methods:</bold> A total of 878 volumetric non-contrast HRCT scans were retrospectively collected from IPF (N = 349, 39.7%) and non-IPF ILD cohorts (N = 529, 60.3%). A five-fold cross-validation was employed for training and validation of the MSGA DL model with a stratification of IPF and non-IPF subjects. Domain Knowledge is acquired as follows: (1) Voxel-level prediction: using the quantitative lung fibrosis (QLF) algorithm on CT scans, a prediction was made on a voxel-level; and (2) Population-level standardization. We provide both qualitative and quantitative methods to examine the extent of explainability. <bold>Results:</bold> Qualitatively, the observed attention maps with no or low attentions are uninformative and lack explainability. Quantitatively, the three best performing models had the AUC (±SD) values 0.987 (±0.007), 0.975 (±0.011), and 0.980 (±0.018), ranging from high to moderate MSGA with random forest classifier, respectively. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> A two-stage model for the IPF diagnosis among subjects with ILD based on chest HRCT was explored. The model combines an attention mechanism, for explainability and a random forest model for enhancing accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa1551
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Don’t be wed to your classification model: deep learning-based models to diagnose idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using computed tomography

Gandham Edmond Jonathan, Pang-yu Teng, GraceHyun Kim, Michael F. McNitt‐Gray et al.
1 citations
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
0.42
article

Don’t be wed to your classification model: deep learning-based models to diagnose idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using computed tomography

Gandham Edmond Jonathan, Pang-yu Teng, GraceHyun Kim, Michael F. McNitt‐Gray, Wenxi Yu, Matthew Brown
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Machine learning and deep learning (DL) models have been developed to quantify or classify interstitial lung disease (ILD) patterns on high-resolution CT images (HRCT). A multi-scale guided attention (MSGA) DL was initially developed to distinguish idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) from non-IPF ILD. <bold>Aims:</bold> This study aimed to explore using a MSGA DL model for this classification task and to investigate the implications of using the channel outputs and the attention mechanism from the DL model. <bold>Methods:</bold> A total of 878 volumetric non-contrast HRCT scans were retrospectively collected from IPF (N = 349, 39.7%) and non-IPF ILD cohorts (N = 529, 60.3%). A five-fold cross-validation was employed for training and validation of the MSGA DL model with a stratification of IPF and non-IPF subjects. Domain Knowledge is acquired as follows: (1) Voxel-level prediction: using the quantitative lung fibrosis (QLF) algorithm on CT scans, a prediction was made on a voxel-level; and (2) Population-level standardization. We provide both qualitative and quantitative methods to examine the extent of explainability. <bold>Results:</bold> Qualitatively, the observed attention maps with no or low attentions are uninformative and lack explainability. Quantitatively, the three best performing models had the AUC (±SD) values 0.987 (±0.007), 0.975 (±0.011), and 0.980 (±0.018), ranging from high to moderate MSGA with random forest classifier, respectively. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> A two-stage model for the IPF diagnosis among subjects with ILD based on chest HRCT was explored. The model combines an attention mechanism, for explainability and a random forest model for enhancing accuracy.

APLA Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.