A molecular method for bacterial infection monitoring in bronchiectasis by RNA quantification

Culture-based methods are the standard-of-care for diagnosing bacterial infections in people with (pw) bronchiectasis (BE), but are prone to contamination, are poorly reproducible and can be associated with lengthy time-to-results. Molecular methods such as quantitative PCR (qPCR) offer a quicker, more sensitive, and more reproducible alternative. However, utility of qPCR in this setting depends on the type of nucleic acid targeted. As DNA is relatively stable, assays targeting this molecule may not adequately differentiate viable from dead bacteria. RNA molecules tend to be less stable after cell death offering a potential means to detect only viable bacteria. We have developed RNA targeting qPCR assays for use in detection and monitoring of bacterial infection in pwBE. These assays were successfully tested on sputum; the Pseudomonas aeruginosa assay showed 100% concordance with culture in positive (20/20) and negative (10/10) samples, and the quantity of RNA measured using our test correlated with quantitative culture (range: 1.6-9 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g). We present data comparing results from our test with quantitative culture and clinical outcome. In addition, we have compared results from the same samples run on our test and on the BIOFIRE Pneumonia panel (bioMerieux), a CE-IVD that provides a semi-quantitative measure of bacterial infection through targeting DNA. We conclude that our RNA-based molecular test is a quantitative alternative to culture that could be used to monitor infection resolution and treatment response, including in the context of eradication treatment. Our test also represents a convenient alternative to quantitative culture for use in the clinical trial setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa1500
Primary Topic
Tracheal and airway disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A molecular method for bacterial infection monitoring in bronchiectasis by RNA quantification

Jamie Long, Marie-Jeanne Kempen, Daniel De Vega, Chandani Hennayake et al.
Tracheal and airway disorders
article

A molecular method for bacterial infection monitoring in bronchiectasis by RNA quantification

Jamie Long, Marie-Jeanne Kempen, Daniel De Vega, Chandani Hennayake, Mateja Sborchia, Rebecca C Hull, Marian F. Young, Eve Mcintosh, James Duncan Chalmers, Rebecca Holmes, C. J. S. Clarke, Rachel Dakin, Zsofia Eke, Adam C. Bell, Maia Kavenagh-Williams, Declan Fawcett-Gibson, Daniela Alferes De Lima Headley, Sarah Williams-Macdonald, Pawlina Dand
article en

Abstract

Culture-based methods are the standard-of-care for diagnosing bacterial infections in people with (pw) bronchiectasis (BE), but are prone to contamination, are poorly reproducible and can be associated with lengthy time-to-results. Molecular methods such as quantitative PCR (qPCR) offer a quicker, more sensitive, and more reproducible alternative. However, utility of qPCR in this setting depends on the type of nucleic acid targeted. As DNA is relatively stable, assays targeting this molecule may not adequately differentiate viable from dead bacteria. RNA molecules tend to be less stable after cell death offering a potential means to detect only viable bacteria. We have developed RNA targeting qPCR assays for use in detection and monitoring of bacterial infection in pwBE. These assays were successfully tested on sputum; the Pseudomonas aeruginosa assay showed 100% concordance with culture in positive (20/20) and negative (10/10) samples, and the quantity of RNA measured using our test correlated with quantitative culture (range: 1.6-9 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g). We present data comparing results from our test with quantitative culture and clinical outcome. In addition, we have compared results from the same samples run on our test and on the BIOFIRE Pneumonia panel (bioMerieux), a CE-IVD that provides a semi-quantitative measure of bacterial infection through targeting DNA. We conclude that our RNA-based molecular test is a quantitative alternative to culture that could be used to monitor infection resolution and treatment response, including in the context of eradication treatment. Our test also represents a convenient alternative to quantitative culture for use in the clinical trial setting.

University of Dundee (GB), BirdLife international (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Tracheal and airway disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.