Spatial Extremal Modelling: A Case Study on the Interplay Between Margins and Dependence

ABSTRACT It is no secret that statistical modelling often involves making simplifying assumptions when attempting to study complex stochastic phenomena. Spatial modelling of extreme values is no exception, with one of the most common such assumptions being stationarity in the marginal and/or dependence features. If non‐stationarity has been detected in the marginal distributions, it is tempting to try to model this while assuming stationarity in the dependence, without necessarily putting this latter assumption through thorough testing. However, margins and dependence are often intricately connected and the detection of non‐stationarity in one feature might affect the detection of non‐stationarity in the other. This work is an in‐depth case study of this interrelationship, with a particular focus on a spatio‐temporal environmental application exhibiting well‐documented marginal non‐stationarity. Specifically, we compare and contrast four different marginal detrending approaches in terms of our post‐detrending ability to detect temporal non‐stationarity in the spatial extremal dependence structure of a sea surface temperature dataset from the Red Sea.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stat
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sta4.70021
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial Extremal Modelling: A Case Study on the Interplay Between Margins and Dependence

Jennifer L. Wadsworth, Emma S. Simpson, Lydia Kakampakou
2 citations
Stat
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
2.26
article

Spatial Extremal Modelling: A Case Study on the Interplay Between Margins and Dependence

Jennifer L. Wadsworth, Emma S. Simpson, Lydia Kakampakou
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT It is no secret that statistical modelling often involves making simplifying assumptions when attempting to study complex stochastic phenomena. Spatial modelling of extreme values is no exception, with one of the most common such assumptions being stationarity in the marginal and/or dependence features. If non‐stationarity has been detected in the marginal distributions, it is tempting to try to model this while assuming stationarity in the dependence, without necessarily putting this latter assumption through thorough testing. However, margins and dependence are often intricately connected and the detection of non‐stationarity in one feature might affect the detection of non‐stationarity in the other. This work is an in‐depth case study of this interrelationship, with a particular focus on a spatio‐temporal environmental application exhibiting well‐documented marginal non‐stationarity. Specifically, we compare and contrast four different marginal detrending approaches in terms of our post‐detrending ability to detect temporal non‐stationarity in the spatial extremal dependence structure of a sea surface temperature dataset from the Red Sea.

StatVol. 13(4)
University College London (GB), Lancaster University (GB)
Met Office, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.