Nitrogen deposition and heathland management cause multi‐element stoichiometric mismatches, reducing insect fitness

Abstract Increased nitrogen and acidifying deposition negatively affect biogeochemical cycles and nutrient stoichiometry, particularly in oligotrophic habitats. In heathlands, management aims to mitigate effects of deposition by topsoil removal (sod‐cutting) or by liming to increase soil pH. However, these management efforts may further exacerbate macro‐ and micronutrient stoichiometric mismatch, with cascading effects on heathland insects. Here, we investigate the physiological mechanisms by which deposition and management affect insects, focusing on nutrient uptake and excretion. We combined a phosphorus (P) addition and liming experiment in previously sod‐cut heathland with laboratory‐rearing experiments using the field cricket ( Gryllus campestris L., 1) as a model species. We hypothesized that P addition would benefit cricket performance by reducing food N:P ratio. Conversely, we hypothesized that liming would reduce performance by decreasing food Mn:Mg and/or Fe:Mg ratios. Elemental uptake efficiency, consumption and reproduction, as well as cricket field density, were significantly higher under increased P availability, confirming insect P limitation in the field. Liming decreased food Mn:Mg ratio and reduced reproductive success, eliminating any beneficial effects of P addition. Moreover, cricket stoichiometry better explained growth rates than the amount of food consumed. The best model highlighted cricket N and Mn content, with increasing N content negatively influencing growth, while the opposite was true for Mn. We found no support for liming‐induced Fe limitation. We propose that both P and Mn limit crickets independently. Specifically, P limitation affects growth via reduced ribosomal content, and Mn limitation impacts growth by limiting arginase activity and hence restricting the recycling of amino acids. Our study shows that restoration management can fail to restore habitat quality for insects and may even amplify mismatches in macro and micronutrient stoichiometry. To address this, the addition of not only P but also Mn may be required as follow‐up management, but reducing N‐emission remains imperative as this removes the need for disruptive management interventions. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.