The Spatiality of Popular Politics on the Urban Margins: Insights from Argentina and Chile
Abstract Popular politics—a heterogeneous set of grassroots demands and subjectivities antagonistic to dominant power blocs—finds itself at a crossroads in Latin America. In Argentina and Chile, progressive governments have failed to curtail a resurgent populist‐right despite, as recently as 2019, appearing to be on the brink of a new centre‐left hegemony. This paper argues that paying attention to the spatiality of popular politics demonstrates a failure to articulate popular politics within a national movement, either neglecting them (under Boric in Chile) or incorporating them in a top‐down strategy that erased particularities (under Fernández in Argentina). It does so from the vantage point of two neighbourhoods at the urban margins in Buenos Aires and Santiago. Bringing together Ernesto Laclau's work on populism together with Henri Lefebvre's relational understanding of urban space, it analyses how popular demands and subjectivities have been articulated in relation to national progressive politics.
Authors
- Sam Halvorsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8215-6946)
- Nicolás Angelcos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8044-0895)
Institutions
- Universidad de Santiago de Chile (CL)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- University of Chile (CL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Antipode
- Published
- 2024-11-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.13106
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Politics and Society in Latin America
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.46
Funders
- British Academy
- Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social
- Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico