The Spatiality of Popular Politics on the Urban Margins: Insights from Argentina and Chile

Abstract Popular politics—a heterogeneous set of grassroots demands and subjectivities antagonistic to dominant power blocs—finds itself at a crossroads in Latin America. In Argentina and Chile, progressive governments have failed to curtail a resurgent populist‐right despite, as recently as 2019, appearing to be on the brink of a new centre‐left hegemony. This paper argues that paying attention to the spatiality of popular politics demonstrates a failure to articulate popular politics within a national movement, either neglecting them (under Boric in Chile) or incorporating them in a top‐down strategy that erased particularities (under Fernández in Argentina). It does so from the vantage point of two neighbourhoods at the urban margins in Buenos Aires and Santiago. Bringing together Ernesto Laclau's work on populism together with Henri Lefebvre's relational understanding of urban space, it analyses how popular demands and subjectivities have been articulated in relation to national progressive politics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antipode
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.13106
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Politics and Society in Latin America
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Spatiality of Popular Politics on the Urban Margins: Insights from Argentina and Chile

Sam Halvorsen, Nicolás Angelcos
2 citations
Antipode
Politics and Society in Latin America
4.46
article

The Spatiality of Popular Politics on the Urban Margins: Insights from Argentina and Chile

Sam Halvorsen, Nicolás Angelcos
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Popular politics—a heterogeneous set of grassroots demands and subjectivities antagonistic to dominant power blocs—finds itself at a crossroads in Latin America. In Argentina and Chile, progressive governments have failed to curtail a resurgent populist‐right despite, as recently as 2019, appearing to be on the brink of a new centre‐left hegemony. This paper argues that paying attention to the spatiality of popular politics demonstrates a failure to articulate popular politics within a national movement, either neglecting them (under Boric in Chile) or incorporating them in a top‐down strategy that erased particularities (under Fernández in Argentina). It does so from the vantage point of two neighbourhoods at the urban margins in Buenos Aires and Santiago. Bringing together Ernesto Laclau's work on populism together with Henri Lefebvre's relational understanding of urban space, it analyses how popular demands and subjectivities have been articulated in relation to national progressive politics.

AntipodeVol. 57(1)
Universidad de Santiago de Chile (CL), Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Chile (CL)
British Academy, Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social, Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Politics and Society in Latin America
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Spatiality of Popular Politics on the Urban Margins: Insights from Argentina and Chile — Sam Halvorsen, Nicolás Angelcos · Antipode (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS