Value of electron microscopy as perceived by nephrologists in Flanders, Belgium
Electron microscopy (EM) is an important complementary tool in biopsy diagnosis of kidney disease. However, EM is a costly technique and not universally available. In order to understand nephrologists' perspectives on EM, a survey among Flemish nephrologists was conducted. The survey explores nephrologists' knowledge and satisfaction with EM, the barriers in its use, and its role in decision-making.A questionnaire was sent out to Dutch-speaking nephrologists in Belgium (Flanders) via the professional organization NBVN <i>(Nederlandstalige Belgische Vereniging voor Nefrologie)</i>.The average satisfaction of EM accessibility in nephrologists, was 4.0 on a scale from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). The main barrier in ordering EM appeared to be the long turnaround time, indicated by 32.5% of nephrologists. The reports were found mostly understandable by 61.0% of the nephrologists. The impact of EM on diagnosis of kidney disease was estimated higher than its impact on the treatment: 24.4% of respondents estimated diagnosis changes in less than 5% of cases, versus 68.3% estimated treatment changes in less than 5% of cases.This study provides key insights into nephrologists' perception on EM services, revealing high overall satisfaction. However, there is potential for improvement, especially regarding turnaround times.
Authors
- Steven Van Laecke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7628-8491)
- Amélie Dendooven (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9900-7952)
- Laura Desnerck
- Laure-Anne Kerckhaert
Institutions
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ultrastructural Pathology
- Published
- 2024-11-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01913123.2024.2423083
- Primary Topic
- Renal and Vascular Pathologies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00