Evidence for Magnetized Basin Ejecta on the Moon From Observations and Modeling of Demagnetized Craters

Abstract The formation of lunar crustal magnetic anomalies is not well understood, and most anomalies are not associated with any obvious geologic features. To investigate further, we studied lunar craters from 100 to 400 km in diameter (totaling 305 craters) that may have demagnetized the crust. We find that the four craters Chaplygin, Keeler, Gauss, and Fermi are highly likely to have demagnetized the crust, based on our statistical methods. We modeled the magnetic source of these craters as a simple hole in a thin magnetized plate, representing the destruction of a surficial magnetized layer (Hypothesis 1). Alternatively, we also simulated the impact demagnetization of deeper‐seated magnetism in the crust by shock and temperature (Hypothesis 2). Some interior magnetization remains unexplained under both hypotheses, but the destruction of a pre‐existing surficial layer of magnetized material is consistent with the location of the peak in each crater's magnetic field. We also find three of the craters are inversely correlated with remotely sensed iron, further supporting our interpretation that the craters demagnetized a surficial layer. The four craters are located on magnetized ejecta deposits from the South Pole‐Aitken, Orientale, and Crisium basins. Hence, these four craters further support the hypothesis that large provinces of magnetized material on the Moon arise from hot impact ejecta that cooled in a dynamo field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024je008420
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence for Magnetized Basin Ejecta on the Moon From Observations and Modeling of Demagnetized Craters

Hyeonhu Park, Brandon Johnson, Ho Jin, I. Garrick‐Bethell
4 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Planetary Science and Exploration
1.33
article

Evidence for Magnetized Basin Ejecta on the Moon From Observations and Modeling of Demagnetized Craters

Hyeonhu Park, Brandon Johnson, Ho Jin, I. Garrick‐Bethell
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract The formation of lunar crustal magnetic anomalies is not well understood, and most anomalies are not associated with any obvious geologic features. To investigate further, we studied lunar craters from 100 to 400 km in diameter (totaling 305 craters) that may have demagnetized the crust. We find that the four craters Chaplygin, Keeler, Gauss, and Fermi are highly likely to have demagnetized the crust, based on our statistical methods. We modeled the magnetic source of these craters as a simple hole in a thin magnetized plate, representing the destruction of a surficial magnetized layer (Hypothesis 1). Alternatively, we also simulated the impact demagnetization of deeper‐seated magnetism in the crust by shock and temperature (Hypothesis 2). Some interior magnetization remains unexplained under both hypotheses, but the destruction of a pre‐existing surficial layer of magnetized material is consistent with the location of the peak in each crater's magnetic field. We also find three of the craters are inversely correlated with remotely sensed iron, further supporting our interpretation that the craters demagnetized a surficial layer. The four craters are located on magnetized ejecta deposits from the South Pole‐Aitken, Orientale, and Crisium basins. Hence, these four craters further support the hypothesis that large provinces of magnetized material on the Moon arise from hot impact ejecta that cooled in a dynamo field.

Journal of Geophysical Research PlanetsVol. 129(11)
University of California, Santa Cruz (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Kyung Hee University (KR)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, National Research Foundation of Korea, Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Planetary Science and Exploration
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.