Change in liking following reduction in sweetness level of carbonated beverages: a randomized controlled parallel trial

Despite recommendations to reduce sweet-tasting foods and beverage consumption, there is limited understanding of our ability to adapt to a less sweet diet and the optimal method for doing so. Thus, we conducted two parallel, double-blind, randomized controlled trials in the USA and Mexico to investigate whether different methods of reducing sweetness could change sweetness preferences. Over 6 months, habitual consumers of full-sugar sweetened (FSS-CSD) or low-calorie sweetened carbonated soft drinks (LCS-CSD) consumed a full sweetness CSD (Control), CSD with gradually decreasing sweetness levels (StepR), and a reduced sweetness test CSD (DirR). The StepR and DirR methods were similarly effective in helping the USA FSS-CSD cohort maintain their preference for reduced-sweetness CSD, without affecting sweetness intensity perception. However, neither method significantly impacted the sweetness intensity perception or preference of the USA LCS-CSD cohort, and the FSS-CSD and LCS-CSD cohorts in Mexico. Nevertheless, participants from both sweetness reduction groups in all cohorts were more willing to purchase reduced sweetness CSD compared to Control, underscoring the potential for consumer acceptance of less sweet beverages regardless of adaptation strategies.This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04609657 and NCT05010408.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77529-w
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Change in liking following reduction in sweetness level of carbonated beverages: a randomized controlled parallel trial

Alissa R. Wilson, Eunice Mah, Traci M. Blonquist, Colin D. Rehm et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
0.93
article

Change in liking following reduction in sweetness level of carbonated beverages: a randomized controlled parallel trial

Alissa R. Wilson, Eunice Mah, Traci M. Blonquist, Colin D. Rehm, Alison Kamil, Shankang Qu, Philip Stern
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Despite recommendations to reduce sweet-tasting foods and beverage consumption, there is limited understanding of our ability to adapt to a less sweet diet and the optimal method for doing so. Thus, we conducted two parallel, double-blind, randomized controlled trials in the USA and Mexico to investigate whether different methods of reducing sweetness could change sweetness preferences. Over 6 months, habitual consumers of full-sugar sweetened (FSS-CSD) or low-calorie sweetened carbonated soft drinks (LCS-CSD) consumed a full sweetness CSD (Control), CSD with gradually decreasing sweetness levels (StepR), and a reduced sweetness test CSD (DirR). The StepR and DirR methods were similarly effective in helping the USA FSS-CSD cohort maintain their preference for reduced-sweetness CSD, without affecting sweetness intensity perception. However, neither method significantly impacted the sweetness intensity perception or preference of the USA LCS-CSD cohort, and the FSS-CSD and LCS-CSD cohorts in Mexico. Nevertheless, participants from both sweetness reduction groups in all cohorts were more willing to purchase reduced sweetness CSD compared to Control, underscoring the potential for consumer acceptance of less sweet beverages regardless of adaptation strategies.This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04609657 and NCT05010408.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
PepsiCo (United Kingdom) (GB), Pepsi (United States) (US)
PepsiCo
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
0.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.