Multi-season evaluation of hurricane analysis and forecast system (HAFS) quantitative precipitation forecasts

Quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPF) from numerical weather prediction models need systematic verification to enable rigorous assessment and informed use, as well as model improvements. The United States (US) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) recently made a major update to its regional tropical cyclone modeling capabilities, introducing two new operational configurations of the Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS). NOAA performed multi-season retrospective forecasts using the HAFS configurations during the period that the Hurricane Weather and Forecasting (HWRF) model was operational, which was used to assess HAFS performance for key tropical cyclone forecast metrics. However, systematic QPF verification was not an integral part of the initial evaluation. The first systematic QPF evaluation of the operational HAFS version 1 configurations is presented here for the 2021 and 2022 season re-forecasts as well as the first HAFS operational season, 2023. A suite of techniques, tools, and metrics within the enhanced Model Evaluation Tools (METplus) software suite are used. This includes shifting forecasts to mitigate track errors, regridding model and observed fields to a storm relative coordinate system, as well as object oriented verification. The HAFS configurations have better performance than HWRF for equitable threat score (ETS), but larger over forecast biases than HWRF. Storm relative and object oriented verification show the HAFS configurations have larger precipitation areas and less intense precipitation near the TC center as compared to observations and HWRF. HAFS QPF performance decreased for the 2023 season, but the general spatial patterns of the model QPF were very similar to 2021-2022.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Earth Science
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1417705
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-season evaluation of hurricane analysis and forecast system (HAFS) quantitative precipitation forecasts

Mrinal K. Biswas, Bruce Nelson, Kathryn M. Newman, Linlin Pan
1 citations
Frontiers in Earth Science
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
0.38
article

Multi-season evaluation of hurricane analysis and forecast system (HAFS) quantitative precipitation forecasts

Mrinal K. Biswas, Bruce Nelson, Kathryn M. Newman, Linlin Pan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPF) from numerical weather prediction models need systematic verification to enable rigorous assessment and informed use, as well as model improvements. The United States (US) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) recently made a major update to its regional tropical cyclone modeling capabilities, introducing two new operational configurations of the Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS). NOAA performed multi-season retrospective forecasts using the HAFS configurations during the period that the Hurricane Weather and Forecasting (HWRF) model was operational, which was used to assess HAFS performance for key tropical cyclone forecast metrics. However, systematic QPF verification was not an integral part of the initial evaluation. The first systematic QPF evaluation of the operational HAFS version 1 configurations is presented here for the 2021 and 2022 season re-forecasts as well as the first HAFS operational season, 2023. A suite of techniques, tools, and metrics within the enhanced Model Evaluation Tools (METplus) software suite are used. This includes shifting forecasts to mitigate track errors, regridding model and observed fields to a storm relative coordinate system, as well as object oriented verification. The HAFS configurations have better performance than HWRF for equitable threat score (ETS), but larger over forecast biases than HWRF. Storm relative and object oriented verification show the HAFS configurations have larger precipitation areas and less intense precipitation near the TC center as compared to observations and HWRF. HAFS QPF performance decreased for the 2023 season, but the general spatial patterns of the model QPF were very similar to 2021-2022.

Frontiers in Earth ScienceVol. 12
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), U.S. National Science Foundation (US), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
0.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.