Pre-service teachers evaluating online texts about learning styles: there is room for improvement in justifying the credibility

Teachers’ abilities to critically evaluate the credibility of online information are fundamental when they educate critical online readers. This study examined pre-service teachers’ abilities to evaluate and justify the credibility of online texts on learning styles. Pre-service teachers ( N = 169) read and evaluated two more and two less credible online texts on learning styles in a web-based environment. Most pre-service teachers were able to differentiate the more credible texts from the less credible ones but struggled with justifying the credibility. Pre-service teachers’ inaccurate prior beliefs about learning styles impeded questioning the less credible texts. Implications for teacher education are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1451002
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre-service teachers evaluating online texts about learning styles: there is room for improvement in justifying the credibility

Pirjo Kulju, Marita Mäkinen, Eija Räikkönen, Carita Kiili et al.
5 citations
Frontiers in Education
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
3.95
article

Pre-service teachers evaluating online texts about learning styles: there is room for improvement in justifying the credibility

Pirjo Kulju, Marita Mäkinen, Eija Räikkönen, Carita Kiili, Elina K. Hämäläinen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Teachers’ abilities to critically evaluate the credibility of online information are fundamental when they educate critical online readers. This study examined pre-service teachers’ abilities to evaluate and justify the credibility of online texts on learning styles. Pre-service teachers ( N = 169) read and evaluated two more and two less credible online texts on learning styles in a web-based environment. Most pre-service teachers were able to differentiate the more credible texts from the less credible ones but struggled with justifying the credibility. Pre-service teachers’ inaccurate prior beliefs about learning styles impeded questioning the less credible texts. Implications for teacher education are discussed.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 9
Tampere University (FI), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Strategic Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
3.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pre-service teachers evaluating online texts about learning styles: there is room for improvement in justifying the credibility — Pirjo Kulju, Marita Mäkinen, et al. · Frontiers in Education (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS