Leveraging a comprehensive unbiased RNAseq database to characterize human monocyte-derived macrophage gene expression profiles within commonly employed in vitro polarization methods

Macrophages are pivotal innate immune cells which exhibit high phenotypic plasticity and can exist in different polarization states dependent on exposure to external stimuli. Numerous methods have been employed to simulate macrophage polarization states to test their function in vitro. However, limited research has explored whether these polarization methods yield comparable populations beyond key gene, cytokine, and cell surface marker expression. Here, we employ an unbiased comprehensive analysis using data organized through the all RNA-seq and ChIP-seq sample and signature search (ARCHS<sup>4</sup>) database, which compiles all RNAseq data deposited into the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA). In silico analyses were carried out demonstrating that commonly employed macrophage polarization methods generate distinct gene expression profiles in macrophage subsets that remained poorly described until now. Our analyses confirm existing knowledge on broad macrophage polarization, while expanding nuanced differences between M2a and M2c subsets, suggesting non-interchangeable stimuli for M2a polarization. Furthermore, we characterize divergent gene expression patterns in M1 macrophages following standard polarization protocols, indicating significant subset distinctions. Consequently, equivalence cannot be assumed among polarization regimens for in vitro macrophage studies, particularly in simulating diverse pathogen responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-78000-6
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Immune cells in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging a comprehensive unbiased RNAseq database to characterize human monocyte-derived macrophage gene expression profiles within commonly employed in vitro polarization methods

Timothy Smyth, Elise Hickman, Ilona Jaspers, Alexis Payton et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Immune cells in cancer
0.48
article

Leveraging a comprehensive unbiased RNAseq database to characterize human monocyte-derived macrophage gene expression profiles within commonly employed in vitro polarization methods

Timothy Smyth, Elise Hickman, Ilona Jaspers, Alexis Payton, Julia E. Rager
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Macrophages are pivotal innate immune cells which exhibit high phenotypic plasticity and can exist in different polarization states dependent on exposure to external stimuli. Numerous methods have been employed to simulate macrophage polarization states to test their function in vitro. However, limited research has explored whether these polarization methods yield comparable populations beyond key gene, cytokine, and cell surface marker expression. Here, we employ an unbiased comprehensive analysis using data organized through the all RNA-seq and ChIP-seq sample and signature search (ARCHS<sup>4</sup>) database, which compiles all RNAseq data deposited into the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA). In silico analyses were carried out demonstrating that commonly employed macrophage polarization methods generate distinct gene expression profiles in macrophage subsets that remained poorly described until now. Our analyses confirm existing knowledge on broad macrophage polarization, while expanding nuanced differences between M2a and M2c subsets, suggesting non-interchangeable stimuli for M2a polarization. Furthermore, we characterize divergent gene expression patterns in M1 macrophages following standard polarization protocols, indicating significant subset distinctions. Consequently, equivalence cannot be assumed among polarization regimens for in vitro macrophage studies, particularly in simulating diverse pathogen responses.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Immune cells in cancer
0.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.