Research progress and prospects for constructing ecological security pattern based on ecological network

• The development process of ecological security patterns (ESP) is divided into three stages. • Building a dynamic pattern of multi-methods, multi-scales, and multi-goals is a vital measure to improve human well-being. • Evaluating and regulating ESP is key to sustaining and enhancing ecosystem sustainability and toughness. • High-level ESP construction focuses on the process, temporal scale, spatial scale, and green-gray corridor balance. As global ecological problems become increasingly prominent, the construction of ecological security pattern (ESP) has become particularly important for ensuring regional ecological security, coordinating social and economic development, and improving the livelihood and well-being of people. ESP construction based on source-resistance surface-corridor-node information has become the main research paradigm. In this study, the literature analysis method is employed to obtain relevant ESP research results systematically from the perspectives of conceptual connotations, construction methods, evaluations and regulations. The conclusions are as follows: (1) Over time, dynamic pattern construction has become a research hotspot; spatially, less attention has been given to areas with multi-scale and cross-administrative boundary. (2) The ESP construction method is relatively mature, but shortcomings remain, such as the neglect of small-scale but important ecological sources, insufficient consideration of species living habits, lack of research on corridor heterogeneity, and inadequate field surveys and visits. (3) Qualitative ESP evaluation focuses on analyzing the rationality and accuracy of the delineated ecological sources. In contrast, quantitative ESP evaluation focuses on the connectivity, accessibility and robustness of ecological network (EN), which has been more widely applied. Multilevel regulation can promote the implementation of ESP. Future research should focus on (1) selecting ecosystem services on the basis of local conditions and considering trade-offs and synergistic relationships, (2) deepening research on the spatiotemporal evolution of ecosystem services and accurate construction of EN, and (3) introducing machine learning to achieve intelligent ESP construction. This paper provides directions for future research, outlines new ideas for the systematic and rigorous construction of ESP and promotes more in-depth and practical global ecological civilization construction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112800
Citations
34
Primary Topic
Environmental Quality and Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research progress and prospects for constructing ecological security pattern based on ecological network

Dong Xu, Fang Wang, Meichen Fu
34 citations
Ecological Indicators
Environmental Quality and Pollution
15.60
article

Research progress and prospects for constructing ecological security pattern based on ecological network

Dong Xu, Fang Wang, Meichen Fu
article en
34 citations

Abstract

• The development process of ecological security patterns (ESP) is divided into three stages. • Building a dynamic pattern of multi-methods, multi-scales, and multi-goals is a vital measure to improve human well-being. • Evaluating and regulating ESP is key to sustaining and enhancing ecosystem sustainability and toughness. • High-level ESP construction focuses on the process, temporal scale, spatial scale, and green-gray corridor balance. As global ecological problems become increasingly prominent, the construction of ecological security pattern (ESP) has become particularly important for ensuring regional ecological security, coordinating social and economic development, and improving the livelihood and well-being of people. ESP construction based on source-resistance surface-corridor-node information has become the main research paradigm. In this study, the literature analysis method is employed to obtain relevant ESP research results systematically from the perspectives of conceptual connotations, construction methods, evaluations and regulations. The conclusions are as follows: (1) Over time, dynamic pattern construction has become a research hotspot; spatially, less attention has been given to areas with multi-scale and cross-administrative boundary. (2) The ESP construction method is relatively mature, but shortcomings remain, such as the neglect of small-scale but important ecological sources, insufficient consideration of species living habits, lack of research on corridor heterogeneity, and inadequate field surveys and visits. (3) Qualitative ESP evaluation focuses on analyzing the rationality and accuracy of the delineated ecological sources. In contrast, quantitative ESP evaluation focuses on the connectivity, accessibility and robustness of ecological network (EN), which has been more widely applied. Multilevel regulation can promote the implementation of ESP. Future research should focus on (1) selecting ecosystem services on the basis of local conditions and considering trade-offs and synergistic relationships, (2) deepening research on the spatiotemporal evolution of ecosystem services and accurate construction of EN, and (3) introducing machine learning to achieve intelligent ESP construction. This paper provides directions for future research, outlines new ideas for the systematic and rigorous construction of ESP and promotes more in-depth and practical global ecological civilization construction.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 168
China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Environmental Quality and Pollution
15.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.