Investigating Nonadherence in an Integrated Diabetic Limb Salvage Programme: Reasons, Associated Factors, and Impacts on Care Outcomes

Adherence to treatment plans is crucial for patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) to achieve positive outcomes. With limited understanding of nonadherence and its impacts on care outcomes, this study aimed to explore the reasons and factors associated with nonadherence in an integrated diabetic limb salvage (DLS) programme and evaluate its effects on care outcomes. This study included 2798 DFU patients who were enrolled in an integrated DLS programme across multiple institutions in central and northern Singapore from 2020 to 2021. Reasons for nonadherence were obtained via telephone interviews. Factors associated with nonadherence were identified using multiple logistic regression. Differences in one-year outcomes, including minor and major lower extremity amputation (LEA), mortality, LEA-free survival, and healthcare utilisation between adherent and nonadherent patients, were examined based on a significance level of <i>P</i> < .05. Nonadherence was observed in 40.2% of patients, with higher rates among younger patients, Malays and Indians, and those with higher HbA1c levels. Patient-related factors were the most commonly reported reasons for missed appointments (50.4%). Compared to adherent patients, nonadherent patients exhibited a relatively higher minor LEA rate (13.0% vs 10.2%, OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.51), lower mortality rate (8.6% vs18.1%, OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.65), higher overall LEA-free survival (76.4% vs 71.1%, OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.53), and more hospitalisations (IRR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.33) and emergency visits (IRR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.39). While nonadherent patients showed relatively higher minor LEA rates and more healthcare utilisation, they also exhibited lower mortality and higher LEA-free survival. This suggests that nonadherence in this population may be associated with complex patient characteristics and behaviours that warrant further investigation to tailor interventions effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241294178
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating Nonadherence in an Integrated Diabetic Limb Salvage Programme: Reasons, Associated Factors, and Impacts on Care Outcomes

Donna Tan, Julia Choo, Wai Han Hoi, Norazrina Azmi et al.
4 citations
The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
1.43
article

Investigating Nonadherence in an Integrated Diabetic Limb Salvage Programme: Reasons, Associated Factors, and Impacts on Care Outcomes

Donna Tan, Julia Choo, Wai Han Hoi, Norazrina Azmi, Hui Yan Koo, Enming Yong, Chelsea Law, James Siow, Tiffany Chew, Daniel Ek Kwang Chew, Kai Qiang Low, Jeremy Hoe, Elaine Tan, Timothy Anthony Yap, Lixia Ge, Jaime Hui Xian Lin, Huiling Liew, Joseph Antonio De Castro Molina, Qiantai Hong, Dexter Yak Seng Chan, Gary Yee Ang, Zhiwen Joseph Lo, Claris Shi, Xiaoli Zhu, Yan Sun, Jo Ann Lim, John Arputhan Abisheganaden, Yi Bing Loh
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Adherence to treatment plans is crucial for patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) to achieve positive outcomes. With limited understanding of nonadherence and its impacts on care outcomes, this study aimed to explore the reasons and factors associated with nonadherence in an integrated diabetic limb salvage (DLS) programme and evaluate its effects on care outcomes. This study included 2798 DFU patients who were enrolled in an integrated DLS programme across multiple institutions in central and northern Singapore from 2020 to 2021. Reasons for nonadherence were obtained via telephone interviews. Factors associated with nonadherence were identified using multiple logistic regression. Differences in one-year outcomes, including minor and major lower extremity amputation (LEA), mortality, LEA-free survival, and healthcare utilisation between adherent and nonadherent patients, were examined based on a significance level of <i>P</i> < .05. Nonadherence was observed in 40.2% of patients, with higher rates among younger patients, Malays and Indians, and those with higher HbA1c levels. Patient-related factors were the most commonly reported reasons for missed appointments (50.4%). Compared to adherent patients, nonadherent patients exhibited a relatively higher minor LEA rate (13.0% vs 10.2%, OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.51), lower mortality rate (8.6% vs18.1%, OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.65), higher overall LEA-free survival (76.4% vs 71.1%, OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.53), and more hospitalisations (IRR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.33) and emergency visits (IRR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.39). While nonadherent patients showed relatively higher minor LEA rates and more healthcare utilisation, they also exhibited lower mortality and higher LEA-free survival. This suggests that nonadherence in this population may be associated with complex patient characteristics and behaviours that warrant further investigation to tailor interventions effectively.

The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
Nanyang Technological University (SG), Tan Tock Seng Hospital (SG), Khoo Teck Puat Hospital (SG), SingHealth Polyclinics (SG), Woodlands Health Campus (SG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.