Forecasting Constraints from Surface Brightness Fluctuations in Galaxy Clusters

Abstract Studies of surface brightness (SB) fluctuations in the intracluster medium present an indirect estimate of turbulent pressure support and associated Mach numbers. While high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy can directly constrain line-of-sight gas motions, including those due to turbulence, such observations are relatively expensive and will be limited to nearby, bright clusters. In this respect, SB fluctuations are the most economical means to constrain turbulent motions at large cluster radii across a range of redshifts and masses. To forecast what current and future X-ray and Sunyaev–Zel’dovich facilities may achieve in SB fluctuation studies, I review and synthesize matters of accuracy and precision with respect to calculating power spectra of SB fluctuations, from which turbulent properties are derived. Balancing concerns of power spectrum accuracy and precision across a range of spatial scales, I propose the use of three annuli with [0, 0.4] R 500 , [0.4, 1] R 500 , and [1, 1.5] R 500 . Adopting these three regions, I calculate the uncertainty in the hydrostatic mass bias, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>b</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-calligraphic" mathvariant="script">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> , that can be achieved for various instruments in several scenarios. I find that Lynx and AtLAST are competitive in their constraints at R 500 , while AtLAST should perform better when constraining <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>b</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-calligraphic" mathvariant="script">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> at R 200 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad794f
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forecasting Constraints from Surface Brightness Fluctuations in Galaxy Clusters

C. Romero
3 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
0.99
article

Forecasting Constraints from Surface Brightness Fluctuations in Galaxy Clusters

C. Romero
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Studies of surface brightness (SB) fluctuations in the intracluster medium present an indirect estimate of turbulent pressure support and associated Mach numbers. While high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy can directly constrain line-of-sight gas motions, including those due to turbulence, such observations are relatively expensive and will be limited to nearby, bright clusters. In this respect, SB fluctuations are the most economical means to constrain turbulent motions at large cluster radii across a range of redshifts and masses. To forecast what current and future X-ray and Sunyaev–Zel’dovich facilities may achieve in SB fluctuation studies, I review and synthesize matters of accuracy and precision with respect to calculating power spectra of SB fluctuations, from which turbulent properties are derived. Balancing concerns of power spectrum accuracy and precision across a range of spatial scales, I propose the use of three annuli with [0, 0.4] R 500 , [0.4, 1] R 500 , and [1, 1.5] R 500 . Adopting these three regions, I calculate the uncertainty in the hydrostatic mass bias, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>b</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-calligraphic" mathvariant="script">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> , that can be achieved for various instruments in several scenarios. I find that Lynx and AtLAST are competitive in their constraints at R 500 , while AtLAST should perform better when constraining <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>b</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-calligraphic" mathvariant="script">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> at R 200 .

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 975(2)
Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
0.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.