Percepción social y tendencia poblacional de mesocarnívoros y ungulados en el noroeste de la península ibérica

Mesocarnivores and ungulates were historically considered as harmful species to humans. Research into the relationship between the actual and perceived population abundance or trend can be useful in mitigating conflicts with these animals. In this work, the information on population trends (i. e. increasing, maintenance or decreasing abundance) obtained through semi-structured interviews with local people was contrasted with the data from a two-times-replicated camera-trap study, separated eight years between them, in the northwestern Iberian Peninsula. In general, we found a divergence between the two sources of information regarding the population trend in only two of the six species under study, red fox and wild boar. Specifically, camera-trap results showed a decrease in red fox catches, not reflected in the face-to-face interviews. On the contrary, face-to-face interviews indicated an increase in wild boar populations, not reflected in the camera-trap study. The findings of this study underscore the necessity of integrating different information sources to accurately assess the population dynamics of mesocarnivores and ungulates, thereby enabling informed management decisions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Galemys Spanish Journal of Mammalogy
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7325/galemys.2024.a4
Primary Topic
Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Percepción social y tendencia poblacional de mesocarnívoros y ungulados en el noroeste de la península ibérica

Noé Ferreira‐Rodríguez, Manuel A. Pombal, Raquel Alonso-Rodríguez
Galemys Spanish Journal of Mammalogy
Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna
article

Percepción social y tendencia poblacional de mesocarnívoros y ungulados en el noroeste de la península ibérica

Noé Ferreira‐Rodríguez, Manuel A. Pombal, Raquel Alonso-Rodríguez
article en

Abstract

Mesocarnivores and ungulates were historically considered as harmful species to humans. Research into the relationship between the actual and perceived population abundance or trend can be useful in mitigating conflicts with these animals. In this work, the information on population trends (i. e. increasing, maintenance or decreasing abundance) obtained through semi-structured interviews with local people was contrasted with the data from a two-times-replicated camera-trap study, separated eight years between them, in the northwestern Iberian Peninsula. In general, we found a divergence between the two sources of information regarding the population trend in only two of the six species under study, red fox and wild boar. Specifically, camera-trap results showed a decrease in red fox catches, not reflected in the face-to-face interviews. On the contrary, face-to-face interviews indicated an increase in wild boar populations, not reflected in the camera-trap study. The findings of this study underscore the necessity of integrating different information sources to accurately assess the population dynamics of mesocarnivores and ungulates, thereby enabling informed management decisions.

Galemys Spanish Journal of MammalogyVol. 36
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.