Family income and polygenic scores are independently but not interactively associated with cognitive performance among youth genetically similar to European reference populations

Cognitive abilities are heritable and influenced by socioeconomic status (SES). It is critical to understand the association between SES and cognition beyond genetic propensity to inform potential benefits of SES-based interventions and to determine if such associations vary across (i) cognitive domains, (ii) facets of SES, and/or (iii) genetic propensity for different aspects of cognition. We examined the contributions of neighborhood socioeconomic advantage, family income, and polygenic scores (PGS) for domains of cognition (i.e., general cognitive ability, executive function, learning and memory, fluid reasoning) in a sample of children (ages 9-10; <i>n</i> = 5549) most genetically similar to reference populations from Europe. With some variability across cognitive outcomes, family income and PGS were independently significantly associated with cognitive performance. Within-sibling analyses revealed that cognitive PGS associations were predominantly driven by between-family effects suggestive of non-direct genetic mechanisms. These findings provide evidence that SES and genetic propensity to cognition have unique associations with cognitive performance in middle childhood. These results underscore the importance of environmental factors and genetic influences in the development of cognitive abilities and caution against overinterpreting associations with PGS of cognitive and educational outcomes as predominantly direct genetic effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579424001573
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Family income and polygenic scores are independently but not interactively associated with cognitive performance among youth genetically similar to European reference populations

Alexander S. Hatoum, Noura Elsayed, Deanna M. Barch, Ryan Bogdan et al.
1 citations
Development and Psychopathology
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
0.51
article

Family income and polygenic scores are independently but not interactively associated with cognitive performance among youth genetically similar to European reference populations

Alexander S. Hatoum, Noura Elsayed, Deanna M. Barch, Ryan Bogdan, Sarah E. Paul, Sarah M. C. Colbert
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Cognitive abilities are heritable and influenced by socioeconomic status (SES). It is critical to understand the association between SES and cognition beyond genetic propensity to inform potential benefits of SES-based interventions and to determine if such associations vary across (i) cognitive domains, (ii) facets of SES, and/or (iii) genetic propensity for different aspects of cognition. We examined the contributions of neighborhood socioeconomic advantage, family income, and polygenic scores (PGS) for domains of cognition (i.e., general cognitive ability, executive function, learning and memory, fluid reasoning) in a sample of children (ages 9-10; <i>n</i> = 5549) most genetically similar to reference populations from Europe. With some variability across cognitive outcomes, family income and PGS were independently significantly associated with cognitive performance. Within-sibling analyses revealed that cognitive PGS associations were predominantly driven by between-family effects suggestive of non-direct genetic mechanisms. These findings provide evidence that SES and genetic propensity to cognition have unique associations with cognitive performance in middle childhood. These results underscore the importance of environmental factors and genetic influences in the development of cognitive abilities and caution against overinterpreting associations with PGS of cognitive and educational outcomes as predominantly direct genetic effects.

Development and PsychopathologyVol. 37(4)
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
0.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.