Comparative Study Of BISAP Score With APACHE-II Scoring System To Determine The Severity Of Acute Pancreatitis

Introduction: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a significant abdominal emergency characterized by inflammation of the pancreas, primarily due to autodigestion by pancreatic enzymes. Early severity assessment is crucial for management, as severe cases lead to complications and mortality. While various scoring systems exist, the Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) and APACHE-II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) scores are commonly used, each with unique advantages and limitations in severity prediction. Objective: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of BISAP and APACHE-II scores in predicting acute pancreatitis severity, helping clinicians optimize treatment decisions. Methods: This observational study was conducted at SMS Hospital, Jaipur, involving 76 patients diagnosed with AP based on clinical, biochemical, and imaging criteria. Participants were assessed using both BISAP and APACHE-II scoring within 24 hours of admission, with a focus on accuracy in predicting severe cases and outcomes. Results: Among participants, the mean age was 43 years, and 84.2% were male. Gallstone disease was the leading cause of AP (55.2%), followed by alcohol (34.2%). BISAP scores ≥3 was associated with significantly higher mortality, highlighting BISAP’s predictive accuracy. The mean BISAP score was 1.86 ± 1.09, while the APACHE-II score was 6.97 ± 5.66, indicating more severe classifications using BISAP. The study found a moderate positive correlation between BISAP and APACHE-II scores, though only BISAP scores significantly predicted patient outcomes. Conclusion: BISAP offers a rapid and accurate assessment tool for AP severity, especially suitable for early intervention in high-risk patients. Compared to APACHE-II, BISAP is simpler, cost-effective, and demonstrates a high negative predictive value, making it more practical for acute settings.