Non‐linear time history analyses of a rigid block isolated with unbonded fiber‐reinforced elastomeric isolators (UFREIs): A comparison between 3D finite element and phenomenological models

Abstract Numerical modeling represents a pivotal tool in the seismic analysis and design of structural systems, enabling the detailed prediction and examination of structural responses under seismic loading. This research conducts a comparative analysis of two numerical modeling approaches aimed at simulating the seismic response of unbonded fiber‐reinforced elastomeric isolators (UFREIs). The research focuses on a finite element (FE) model developed using Abaqus and a developed phenomenological model implemented in OpenSees, outlining the development and calibration processes for each. The FE model is developed based on simple rubber material testing data, while the phenomenological model is calibrated using experimental results from cyclic shear tests conducted on the UFREI device and the FE model. The primary objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of these modeling approaches in predicting UFREI behavior under seismic conditions. This evaluation entails comparing model predictions with experimental data obtained from unidirectional shake table tests performed on a rigid block isolated by two UFREIs. This paper highlights the distinct advantages and limitations of each model in simulating UFREI dynamic responses during seismic events. Furthermore, it provides insights into the modeling techniques and discusses the computational demands and data requirements of each model, thereby aiding in their application to various aspects of seismic analysis and design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4263
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non‐linear time history analyses of a rigid block isolated with unbonded fiber‐reinforced elastomeric isolators (UFREIs): A comparison between 3D finite element and phenomenological models

Niel C. Van Engelen, Gabriele Milani, Rajeev Ruparathna, Hediyeh Sheikh et al.
4 citations
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
1.04
article

Non‐linear time history analyses of a rigid block isolated with unbonded fiber‐reinforced elastomeric isolators (UFREIs): A comparison between 3D finite element and phenomenological models

Niel C. Van Engelen, Gabriele Milani, Rajeev Ruparathna, Hediyeh Sheikh, Gaetano Pianese
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Numerical modeling represents a pivotal tool in the seismic analysis and design of structural systems, enabling the detailed prediction and examination of structural responses under seismic loading. This research conducts a comparative analysis of two numerical modeling approaches aimed at simulating the seismic response of unbonded fiber‐reinforced elastomeric isolators (UFREIs). The research focuses on a finite element (FE) model developed using Abaqus and a developed phenomenological model implemented in OpenSees, outlining the development and calibration processes for each. The FE model is developed based on simple rubber material testing data, while the phenomenological model is calibrated using experimental results from cyclic shear tests conducted on the UFREI device and the FE model. The primary objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of these modeling approaches in predicting UFREI behavior under seismic conditions. This evaluation entails comparing model predictions with experimental data obtained from unidirectional shake table tests performed on a rigid block isolated by two UFREIs. This paper highlights the distinct advantages and limitations of each model in simulating UFREI dynamic responses during seismic events. Furthermore, it provides insights into the modeling techniques and discusses the computational demands and data requirements of each model, thereby aiding in their application to various aspects of seismic analysis and design.

Earthquake Engineering & Structural DynamicsVol. 54(2)
University of Windsor (CA), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.