Consumer Protection in Business Law: Conflict of Norms and its Implications under Article 18 of Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection

Consumer protection is an important aspect of business law that often clashes with the principle of freedom of contract. This paper analyzes the conflict between Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK) and Article 1320 of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata) in the context of consumer protection in Indonesia. The norm conflict arises mainly in the use of standard clauses in standard contracts, which can harm consumers. John Rawls' theory of justice and Gustav Radbruch's theory of legal certainty are used to understand how the law can balance the interests of consumer protection and freedom of contract. In addition, technological developments and globalization also complicate the application of GCPL in electronic and cross-border transactions. The author suggests several legal strategies to address this conflict, including revision of laws, integration of technology, and harmonization of international law. In conclusion, effective consumer protection requires a balance between substantive justice and legal certainty and adaptation to technological change and market dynamics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i10-42
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European and International Contract Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer Protection in Business Law: Conflict of Norms and its Implications under Article 18 of Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection

Marlinah Marlinah, Mulia Akbar Santoso
1 citations
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS
European and International Contract Law
4.07
article

Consumer Protection in Business Law: Conflict of Norms and its Implications under Article 18 of Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection

Marlinah Marlinah, Mulia Akbar Santoso
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Consumer protection is an important aspect of business law that often clashes with the principle of freedom of contract. This paper analyzes the conflict between Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK) and Article 1320 of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata) in the context of consumer protection in Indonesia. The norm conflict arises mainly in the use of standard clauses in standard contracts, which can harm consumers. John Rawls' theory of justice and Gustav Radbruch's theory of legal certainty are used to understand how the law can balance the interests of consumer protection and freedom of contract. In addition, technological developments and globalization also complicate the application of GCPL in electronic and cross-border transactions. The author suggests several legal strategies to address this conflict, including revision of laws, integration of technology, and harmonization of international law. In conclusion, effective consumer protection requires a balance between substantive justice and legal certainty and adaptation to technological change and market dynamics.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSISVol. 07(10)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
European and International Contract Law
4.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.