Conceptualizing a ‘power game field’ through the case of ‘ <i>Padrão FIFA</i> ’: bridging together Beckian and Bourdieusian insights

A central question within social theorization relates to the rescaling of ‘power’ in a globalized world. This paper advances sociological debates on power by cross-pollinating Beck’s power game theory with Bourdieu’s field. Hence, it conceptualizes what we call a ‘power game field’. This captures the power competition that cuts across local, national and global fields and involves, likewise, local, national and transnational actors whose capital and social relations shape the field’s outcomes. Using a global sport mega-event as our empirical setting, we explore the struggles and compliances in the power game field. Specifically, in the context of how the standards imposed on Brazil by football’s governing body (FIFA) – framed nationally as ‘Padrão FIFA’ – were contested within a localized media setting (2007–2014). This is done through a frame analysis of readers’ letters and media articles, which reveals the importance of Beck’s ‘both-and’ logic and the notion of ‘communal capital’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Globalizations
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2024.2421133
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Sports Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptualizing a ‘power game field’ through the case of ‘ Padrão FIFA ’: bridging together Beckian and Bourdieusian insights

Jan André Lee Ludvigsen, Renan Petersen‐Wagner
Globalizations
Physical Education and Sports Studies
article

Conceptualizing a ‘power game field’ through the case of ‘ Padrão FIFA ’: bridging together Beckian and Bourdieusian insights

Jan André Lee Ludvigsen, Renan Petersen‐Wagner
article en

Abstract

A central question within social theorization relates to the rescaling of ‘power’ in a globalized world. This paper advances sociological debates on power by cross-pollinating Beck’s power game theory with Bourdieu’s field. Hence, it conceptualizes what we call a ‘power game field’. This captures the power competition that cuts across local, national and global fields and involves, likewise, local, national and transnational actors whose capital and social relations shape the field’s outcomes. Using a global sport mega-event as our empirical setting, we explore the struggles and compliances in the power game field. Specifically, in the context of how the standards imposed on Brazil by football’s governing body (FIFA) – framed nationally as ‘Padrão FIFA’ – were contested within a localized media setting (2007–2014). This is done through a frame analysis of readers’ letters and media articles, which reveals the importance of Beck’s ‘both-and’ logic and the notion of ‘communal capital’.

Globalizations
Liverpool John Moores University (GB), Leeds Beckett University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Physical Education and Sports Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conceptualizing a ‘power game field’ through the case of ‘ <i>Padrão FIFA</i> ’: bridging together Beckian and Bourdieusian insights — Jan André Lee Ludvigsen, Renan Petersen‐Wagner · Globalizations (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS