Comparing Two Geostatistical Simulation Algorithms for Modelling the Spatial Uncertainty of Texture in Forest Soils

Uncertainty assessment is an essential part of modeling and mapping the spatial variability of key soil properties, such as texture. The study aimed to compare sequential Gaussian simulation (SGS) and turning bands simulation (TBS) for assessing the uncertainty in unknown values of the textural fractions accounting for their compositional nature. The study area was a forest catchment (1.39 km2) with soils classified as Typic Xerumbrepts and Ultic Haploxeralf. Samples were collected at 135 locations (0.20 m depth) according to a design developed using a spatial simulated annealing algorithm. Isometric log-ratio (ilr) was used to transform the three textural fractions into a two-dimensional real vector of coordinates ilr.1 and ilr.2, then 100 realizations were simulated using SGS and TBS. The realizations obtained by SGS and TBS showed a strong similarity in reproducing the distribution of ilr.1 and ilr.2 with minimal differences in average conditional variances of all grid nodes. The variograms of ilr.1 and ilr.2 coordinates were better reproduced by the realizations obtained by TBS. Similar results in reproducing the texture data statistics by both algorithms of simulation were obtained. The maps of expected values and standard deviations of the three soil textural fractions obtained by SGS and TBS showed no notable visual differences or visual artifacts. The realizations obtained by SGS and TBS showed a strong similarity in reproducing the distribution of isometric log-ratio coordinates (ilr.1 and ilr.2). Overall, their variograms and data were better reproduced by the realizations obtained by TBS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111835
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Two Geostatistical Simulation Algorithms for Modelling the Spatial Uncertainty of Texture in Forest Soils

Gabriele Buttafuocò
1 citations
Land
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
0.21
article

Comparing Two Geostatistical Simulation Algorithms for Modelling the Spatial Uncertainty of Texture in Forest Soils

Gabriele Buttafuocò
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Uncertainty assessment is an essential part of modeling and mapping the spatial variability of key soil properties, such as texture. The study aimed to compare sequential Gaussian simulation (SGS) and turning bands simulation (TBS) for assessing the uncertainty in unknown values of the textural fractions accounting for their compositional nature. The study area was a forest catchment (1.39 km2) with soils classified as Typic Xerumbrepts and Ultic Haploxeralf. Samples were collected at 135 locations (0.20 m depth) according to a design developed using a spatial simulated annealing algorithm. Isometric log-ratio (ilr) was used to transform the three textural fractions into a two-dimensional real vector of coordinates ilr.1 and ilr.2, then 100 realizations were simulated using SGS and TBS. The realizations obtained by SGS and TBS showed a strong similarity in reproducing the distribution of ilr.1 and ilr.2 with minimal differences in average conditional variances of all grid nodes. The variograms of ilr.1 and ilr.2 coordinates were better reproduced by the realizations obtained by TBS. Similar results in reproducing the texture data statistics by both algorithms of simulation were obtained. The maps of expected values and standard deviations of the three soil textural fractions obtained by SGS and TBS showed no notable visual differences or visual artifacts. The realizations obtained by SGS and TBS showed a strong similarity in reproducing the distribution of isometric log-ratio coordinates (ilr.1 and ilr.2). Overall, their variograms and data were better reproduced by the realizations obtained by TBS.

LandVol. 13(11)
National Research Council (IT)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.