How far is too far? Urban versus rural acceptable travel distances

This study examines spatial heterogeneity in acceptable travel distances across destination types and travel modes, contributing to the normative debate on setting accessibility sufficiency thresholds. Utilizing data from a 2020 survey on perceived accessibility in the Netherlands, the research finds that acceptable travel distances vary between urban and rural areas, contingent upon the mode of transportation. Rural residents accept larger distances, primarily facilitated by car use, while acceptable distances for active modes are higher in urban areas. Particularly in rural areas, travel distances do not always align with the acceptance of distances, especially regarding public transport. The key message for accessibility policy is that uniform distance thresholds may be ineffective across regions with diverse accessibility needs. The study concludes that empirical insights into the sources of variation in acceptable travel distances can assist in addressing the tension between setting general accessibility thresholds and strategies tailored to specific groups in specific areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104474
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How far is too far? Urban versus rural acceptable travel distances

Felix Johan Pot, Linus Piesch
6 citations
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.10
article

How far is too far? Urban versus rural acceptable travel distances

Felix Johan Pot, Linus Piesch
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study examines spatial heterogeneity in acceptable travel distances across destination types and travel modes, contributing to the normative debate on setting accessibility sufficiency thresholds. Utilizing data from a 2020 survey on perceived accessibility in the Netherlands, the research finds that acceptable travel distances vary between urban and rural areas, contingent upon the mode of transportation. Rural residents accept larger distances, primarily facilitated by car use, while acceptable distances for active modes are higher in urban areas. Particularly in rural areas, travel distances do not always align with the acceptance of distances, especially regarding public transport. The key message for accessibility policy is that uniform distance thresholds may be ineffective across regions with diverse accessibility needs. The study concludes that empirical insights into the sources of variation in acceptable travel distances can assist in addressing the tension between setting general accessibility thresholds and strategies tailored to specific groups in specific areas.

Transportation Research Part D Transport and EnvironmentVol. 137
University of Groningen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How far is too far? Urban versus rural acceptable travel distances — Felix Johan Pot, Linus Piesch · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS