Split‐plot experiments with replicated runs in pharmaceutical synthesis

Abstract Restricted randomised designs are essential in the pharmaceutical synthesis due to the operational restrictions and their cost‐effectiveness compared to entirely randomised designs. Specifically, the split‐plot designs are very effective in reducing the cost of an experiment in the presence of hard‐to‐change factors and/or of multi‐stage processes. In classical designs, replicated runs for pure‐error estimation are commonly employed, but they are rarely used in the more complex setting of restricted randomisation. The reason is that, in practice, experiments in industry rarely can follow all the assumptions/conditions that are included in the methodological papers. In this work, we demonstrate how a split‐plot design based on a Bayesian ‐optimality criterion built to ensure more precise pure‐error estimation of the variance components can be easily adapted to fit the additional needs, the speedy implementation and the restrictions that a real case scenario in industry often imposes. We focus on the practical aspect of how to modify the complex design in a way that keeps/improves the desired qualities and on how to assess impact of changes that are more arbitrary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3676
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Split‐plot experiments with replicated runs in pharmaceutical synthesis

Martin Otava, Kalliopi Mylona
3 citations
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
1.47
article

Split‐plot experiments with replicated runs in pharmaceutical synthesis

Martin Otava, Kalliopi Mylona
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Restricted randomised designs are essential in the pharmaceutical synthesis due to the operational restrictions and their cost‐effectiveness compared to entirely randomised designs. Specifically, the split‐plot designs are very effective in reducing the cost of an experiment in the presence of hard‐to‐change factors and/or of multi‐stage processes. In classical designs, replicated runs for pure‐error estimation are commonly employed, but they are rarely used in the more complex setting of restricted randomisation. The reason is that, in practice, experiments in industry rarely can follow all the assumptions/conditions that are included in the methodological papers. In this work, we demonstrate how a split‐plot design based on a Bayesian ‐optimality criterion built to ensure more precise pure‐error estimation of the variance components can be easily adapted to fit the additional needs, the speedy implementation and the restrictions that a real case scenario in industry often imposes. We focus on the practical aspect of how to modify the complex design in a way that keeps/improves the desired qualities and on how to assess impact of changes that are more arbitrary.

Quality and Reliability Engineering InternationalVol. 41(2)
King's College London (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.