Quality Improvement Initiatives for Pleural Infection Managed with Intrapleural Therapy

<b>Rationale:</b> Pleural infection is associated with significant mortality, and its management is complex. Little attention has been given to care-process metrics such as management delays, pleural drainage practices, and adequacy of intrapleural therapy administration despite their potential impact on outcomes. Audits revealed gaps in those care processes in our institution. <b>Objectives:</b> To assess the impact of quality-improvement initiatives on pleural effusion management in adults. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a retrospective comparison of patients treated with intrapleural therapy for pleural infection at the McGill University Health Center before (April 2013 to April 2016; <i>N</i> = 109) and after interventions (June 2020 to June 2021; <i>N</i> = 44). Interventions included a pleural drainage policy and order set, an intrapleural therapy protocol and preprinted order, implementation of intrapleural therapy administration by nurses, local pleural infection guideline development, and an online learning module for physicians. Major outcomes (length of stay, mortality, surgical treatment) and care-process metrics (management delays, pleural drainage practices, intrapleural therapy administration) were compared between the two periods. <b>Results:</b> After implementation of the interventions, in-hospital mortality and length of stay were unchanged, but the incidence of surgical management went from 14% to 0% (<i>P</i> = 0.01). Delays in drain insertion and intrapleural therapy initiation were not significantly different. Insertion of drains smaller than 12 F decreased from 51% to 7% (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Drain blockage decreased from 20% to 2% (<i>P</i> = 0.004). The incidence of additional drain insertion went from 62% to 48% (<i>P</i> = 0.12). After interventions, 70% of intrapleural therapy doses were given by nurses, the intrapleural therapy protocol was more often adequately followed, fewer doses were missed, and less extended therapy was prescribed. Complications related to drain insertion and intrapleural therapy were similar between the two periods. <b>Conclusions:</b> After the implementation of multifaceted quality improvement interventions for pleural infection including the involvement of nurses in pleural drain flushing and intrapleural therapy, improvements were observed in intrapleural therapy administration, chest drainage practices, and need for surgery. However, length of stay, mortality, and management delays were unchanged.